Live data from Hacker News

I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

neuberg.ai

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#21
post #14
post #2

I built Neuberg because I’d always wanted a Bloomberg Terminal, but as an independent trader, I just couldn’t justify paying $24,000 a year for it. So I decided to build my own with Claude Code. It’s a real-time trading terminal covering fixed income, derivatives, commodities, equities, credit, macro, and alternative assets, with 516 panels in total. You can freely drag, drop, and arrange them however you like. What…

Most of the value of the Bloomberg terminal is the data, not the number of panels

Nonsense, when he'll have one panel per screen pixel, he'll be able to see over 8 million Fibonacci retracements, 40 heatmaps and real-time market sentiment headlines at once on a 4k monitor, then you'll see.

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#22
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I understand correctly, you had 30 working panels for the core functionality. You then vibe-coded an additional 486 new panels that use fake data? That's not quite how you presented the project in the title.

What do you mean? It says used AI in the title. That already implies it doesn't actually work.

Strong disagree on AI implying it doesn’t actually work. Staff engineers at FAANG are vibe coding these days and their stuff absolutely works.

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#23
post #2

I built Neuberg because I’d always wanted a Bloomberg Terminal, but as an independent trader, I just couldn’t justify paying $24,000 a year for it. So I decided to build my own with Claude Code. It’s a real-time trading terminal covering fixed income, derivatives, commodities, equities, credit, macro, and alternative assets, with 516 panels in total. You can freely drag, drop, and arrange them however you like. What…

The thing here is I don’t think you’re going to be able to get your hands on the data that the Bloomberg terminal provides especially not near real time live streaming data which is the reason people pay $25,000 a year. You’re not really paying for the interface, that is easy.

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean? It says used AI in the title. That already implies it doesn't actually work.

Strong disagree on AI implying it doesn’t actually work. Staff engineers at FAANG are vibe coding these days and their stuff absolutely works.

> Staff engineers at FAANG are vibe coding these days and their stuff absolutely works.

60% of the time it works 100% of the time

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#25
post #14
post #2

I built Neuberg because I’d always wanted a Bloomberg Terminal, but as an independent trader, I just couldn’t justify paying $24,000 a year for it. So I decided to build my own with Claude Code. It’s a real-time trading terminal covering fixed income, derivatives, commodities, equities, credit, macro, and alternative assets, with 516 panels in total. You can freely drag, drop, and arrange them however you like. What…

Most of the value of the Bloomberg terminal is the data, not the number of panels

... and speed. They publish billions of ticker items in near real time simultaneously to all their users... the tech is pretty crazy!

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean? It says used AI in the title. That already implies it doesn't actually work.

Strong disagree on AI implying it doesn’t actually work. Staff engineers at FAANG are vibe coding these days and their stuff absolutely works.

You really want to claim that with the amount of outages lately?

We are trending towards zero nines (not 100) uptime.

Re: I built a 516-panel financial terminal in 3 weeks using AI

#28

Just curious if “number of panels” is a genuine metric by which financial terminals are judged?

Panel is an arbitrary UX delimiter, so fundamentally no, unless you're really pedantic in defining (upfront) panel as a meaningfully semantic unit across apps.
Post reply on HN