Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

theregister.com

21–30 of 245 posts

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#21
post #15

What is the best way to get start with open weight models? And are they a good alternative to Claude Code?

Just install ollama.

And no, they're not as capable as SOTA models. Not by far.

However they can help reduce your token expenditure a lot by routing them the low-hanging fruit. Summaries, translations, stuff like that.

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#22
I'm finishing my annual paid Pro Gemini plan, so I'm on the free plan for Claude and I asked one (1) single question, which admittedly was about a research plan, using the Sonnet 4.6 Extended thinking model and instantly hit my limit until 2 PM (it was around 8 or 9 AM).

Just a shockingly constrained service tier right now.

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#24
post #15

What is the best way to get start with open weight models? And are they a good alternative to Claude Code?

If you want to still use APIs, I like OpenRouter because I can use the same credits across various models, so I'm not stuck with a single family of models. (Actually, you can even use the proprietary models on OpenRouter, but they're eye-wateringly expensive.)

Otherwise you should look into running e.g. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Qwen3.5-27B on your own computer. They're not Opus-level but from what I've heard they're capable for smaller tasks. llama.cpp works well for inference; it works well on both CPU and GPUs and even split across both if you want.

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#25

I'm guessing their newer models are taking way more compute than they can afford to give away. The biggest challenge of AI will eventually be, how to bring down how much compute a powerful model takes. I hope Claude puts more emphasis into making Haiku and Sonnet better, when I use them via JetBrains AI it feels like only Opus is good enough, for whatever odd reason.

I get the same. Work has shifted to being agentic first - and whenever I use anything other than Claude Opus it seems that the model easily gets lost spinning its wheels on even the simplest query - especially with some of our more complex codebases, whereas Opus manages to not only reason adequately about the codebase, but also can produce decent quality code/tests in fairly short order.

Oddly though, when using at home I'm using Sonnet via the standard chat interface and that, whilst it will produce substandard code in its output is still reasonably capable - even in more niche tasks. Granted though that my personal projects are far simpler than the codebase I handle at work.

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#26
post #18
post #14

Over reliance on LLMs is going to become such a disaster in a way no one would have thought possible. Not sure exactly what, who, when, or where.. Just that having your entire product or repo dependent on a single entity is going to lead to some bad times…

> on a single entity Contrary to the popular opinion here, there are other services beyond Claude Code. These usage limits might even prompt (har har) people to notice that Gemini is cheaper and often better.

On-premise LLMs are also getting better and likely won’t stop; as costs go up with the technical improvements, I would imagine cost saving methods to also improve

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#27

I'm finishing my annual paid Pro Gemini plan, so I'm on the free plan for Claude and I asked one (1) single question, which admittedly was about a research plan, using the Sonnet 4.6 Extended thinking model and instantly hit my limit until 2 PM (it was around 8 or 9 AM). Just a shockingly constrained service tier right now.

Free is free. Want more, fork over money.

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#29
post #14

Over reliance on LLMs is going to become such a disaster in a way no one would have thought possible. Not sure exactly what, who, when, or where.. Just that having your entire product or repo dependent on a single entity is going to lead to some bad times…

For a second I hoped you were gonna comment on how LLMs are going to rot out our skillset and our brains. Like some people already complaining they "have to think" when ChatGPT or Claude or Grok is down.

Oh well.

Re: Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'

#30
post #18
post #14

Over reliance on LLMs is going to become such a disaster in a way no one would have thought possible. Not sure exactly what, who, when, or where.. Just that having your entire product or repo dependent on a single entity is going to lead to some bad times…

> on a single entity Contrary to the popular opinion here, there are other services beyond Claude Code. These usage limits might even prompt (har har) people to notice that Gemini is cheaper and often better.

Gemini is not better on the quotas: https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/quota-limit-for-pro-plan/130...
Post reply on HN