On that note, do we have an open standard for OS implementations? Where the fuck is our modern scratch made OS written in Rust?
It’s about time we topple this shitty triopoly.
21–30 of 64 posts
On that note, do we have an open standard for OS implementations? Where the fuck is our modern scratch made OS written in Rust?
It’s about time we topple this shitty triopoly.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly this. And it is on a portion of the Start menu that can be fully disabled. Heck, my start menu looks like the Windows 10 start menu (yes, this is OOTB) as I wasn't fond of the "new" look of the Windows 11 start menu. But we'll always hear "it's React!". Like most things, the masses must feed on the Internet outrage without critical thought.
> And it is on a portion of the Start menu that can be fully disabled. I mean, with tons of effort and config Windows can be turned into a usable OS. Needing to do all that is a huge part of the problem.
> This is the Windows 11 start menu. See that Recommended section at the bottom of it? That is built with React Native for Windows. No, that is not a full JavaScript framework in your start menu. There’s no web view / browser running gobbling up your resources. It’s React Native for Windows which is a flavor of React Native that directly calls Windows APIs including, you guessed it, WinUI 3. I would still say that me…
React Native, absolutely - as with Office 365, using WinUI 3 as the underlying UI layer.
It’s garbage either way. On that note, do we have an open standard for OS implementations? Where the fuck is our modern scratch made OS written in Rust? It’s about time we topple this shitty triopoly.
It’s garbage either way. On that note, do we have an open standard for OS implementations? Where the fuck is our modern scratch made OS written in Rust? It’s about time we topple this shitty triopoly.
Because that's what you get when you start from scratch.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> That is built with React Native for Windows. No, that is not a full JavaScript framework in your start menu. This is incorrect. It is a full JavaScript framework in your start menu. I don't see your read that it's about ram-hungry web views either. To me, "Start menu uses React" is a dig that Microsoft is so uncommitted to it's native development platform that they (partially) don't use it in one of the most 'core'…
Shouldn't devs be allowed to select what they feel is the "best" choice for a given component? While I wouldn't expect to see a SwiftUI in Windows from Microsoft, Microsoft hasn't been adverse to various NIH web frameworks for quite some time now. If it fits and meets the goals of the project, why not?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shouldn't devs be allowed to select what they feel is the "best" choice for a given component? While I wouldn't expect to see a SwiftUI in Windows from Microsoft, Microsoft hasn't been adverse to various NIH web frameworks for quite some time now. If it fits and meets the goals of the project, why not?
If Microsoft developers' "best" choice for a tiny UI component like this is not it's flagship native UI framework, then that's a problem for Microsoft. That is the criticism.
>Windows Start does not use React Ok >This is the part of the Windows Start that uses React. Ok
Is the recommendations panel in the start menu, which nobody actually wants to begin with, really so complicated that it justifies bringing in a JS runtime?
And is C# and WinUI really so hard to use that they can’t just make it with that?
And if WinUI is hard to use, maybe they should like.. make it better?
At least Apple had the decency to take the React paradigm and turn it into a native part of their development platform with SwiftUI, even if the implementation has been a bit rough around the edges.
[1] https://microsoft.github.io/react-native-macos/docs/intro