Live data from Hacker News

US to embed Palantir AI across military

thecradle.co

21–30 of 30 posts

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#21

They’re trying to rush this integration as widely to make Palantir too critical to walk away for when the administrations change.

This seems like the right analysis. They have JD Vance and presumably other Thiel acolytes in power.

Presumably the next admin will be less.. fascist

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#24
post #11
post #7

It's software that lets you move people from a video feed, to a kanban "target" board, to a grave. Is this what we wanted from our tech careers? I'm just old enough to remember when we thought tech would help people; not just help kill them.

The most brilliant minds of this generation work on ads, crypto gambling and assassination systems.

then they are not brilliant are they, if they choose money over all else. dumbasses infact.

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#26
post #2

Interesting. When reading dystopian SciFi books, about a future where big corporations are above state governments and dominate the world I couldn't quite believe it. But such future becomes a lot more believable now.

> I couldn't quite believe it Not sure how that was ever unbelievable to you. Governments are and have always been relics of the past. Systems that we all tolerate because removing them would be too big a hassle for most people who are simply content enough with things the way they are—and without the people these systems continue to endure. It has always been a matter of time before a system more all-encompassing en…

I don't want to downvote this because it's interesting, but the tone "you're an idiot if you don't already believe my extremely niche view" works against you.

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I couldn't quite believe it Not sure how that was ever unbelievable to you. Governments are and have always been relics of the past. Systems that we all tolerate because removing them would be too big a hassle for most people who are simply content enough with things the way they are—and without the people these systems continue to endure. It has always been a matter of time before a system more all-encompassing en…

I don't want to downvote this because it's interesting, but the tone "you're an idiot if you don't already believe my extremely niche view" works against you.

You could not frame my impresssion of this post better.

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#28
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a lot of apologizing for murdering children you’re doing there. A lot of formers in there as well.

[flagged]

Where are the children of people who live on base supposed to go to school?

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#29

They’re trying to rush this integration as widely to make Palantir too critical to walk away for when the administrations change.

Or they're trying to rush the integration before the November election, so they can use the information that Palantir has been openly collecting on Americans [0] to guide domestic military deployments. [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir...

You know they will try given everything else they are doing to influence elections so blatantly.

Re: US to embed Palantir AI across military

#30
post #6

I'm curious as to how Palantir has been used during the war or Iran (if at all or does it suffer from subjective bias). I know there were larger movements at play on a political level here but I'm becoming concerned about how much one "thought group" (in private corps) is having on the world's largest war machine. might be dulling critical thinking.

You must be trolling. Did you read the article?

Sorry, I did compose it from my phone and wasn't clear. I realize the article talks to the Maven tooling I was talking to it's data aggregation and modeling suite more generally. (And obviously would have been used as part of the Iranian engagement. The "if at all" statement was meant to be "tongue in cheek" given the current mess being reported)
Post reply on HN