Live data from Hacker News

A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

msn.com

21–30 of 119 posts

Re: A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

#21

What does bigfoot have to do with conspiracy? Doesn't bigfoot qualify as folklore/urban legend/pseudoscience/hoax/mythology? Is there widespread belief the government is actively covering up its existence for some reason? Nothing in the linked story explained it. Did someone make a whole documentary and couldn't get the most basic info right? Or did the reporter mangle the article write-up?

[dead]

Re: A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

#23
post #19

I used to look down on conspiracy theories, now I think many are actually true, or are mixed with truth. Its really unlikely that a theory circulates widely but has no basis in reality

They're all on a spectrum between flat earth and Epstein didn't off himself, with some clustering at either end

Wasn't Epstein a conspiracy theory once? Epstein cover up has made me believe that cover ups DO happen, and if this one was covered up, what else has been cover up?

Re: A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

#24

I used to look down on conspiracy theories, now I think many are actually true, or are mixed with truth. Its really unlikely that a theory circulates widely but has no basis in reality

“Reality” applies pretty much zero selection pressure on ideas that are by definition non-actionable.

That’s the real bread and butter of conspiracy theorizing: claims that don’t matter to anyone’s real lives whether they’re actually true or not.

Therefore they propagate primarily for entertainment value and face none of the friction that you’re imagining being generated by “doesn’t actually make useful predictions about the world.”

Re: A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

#25
post #19

I used to look down on conspiracy theories, now I think many are actually true, or are mixed with truth. Its really unlikely that a theory circulates widely but has no basis in reality

They're all on a spectrum between flat earth and Epstein didn't off himself, with some clustering at either end

I don't understand the Epstein thing. In particular, I don't know why everyone doesn't agree "Epstein had help offing himself". That's the most natural inference from the evidence I'm aware of, and also satisfies the conspiracist urge for drama. Everyone should be happy with this, but I've hardly ever heard anyone else put it forward. What am I missing?

Re: A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

#27
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're all on a spectrum between flat earth and Epstein didn't off himself, with some clustering at either end

Wasn't Epstein a conspiracy theory once? Epstein cover up has made me believe that cover ups DO happen, and if this one was covered up, what else has been cover up?

It still is, and it is plainly a true conspiracy. Hence its placement at the top end of the spectrum.

What else has been covered up? Oh boy...

Re: A new Bigfoot documentary helps explain our conspiracy-minded era

#30
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it? Because plenty of other hoax-based bullshit, like Flat Earth Conspiracy Theorists and those who believe that the Earth is only 6,000 years old continue on in their bubbles regardless of how much evidence is provided to the contrary.

There’s no possible evidence against so called “last Thursdayism”, so you are certainly misrepresenting the state of affairs.

What's strange is that many people who believe in a Mature Creation (as I've heard it; "Last Thursdayism" is new to me) will readily accept it as the explanation for ancient starlight but then deny evolution and claim that the fossil record is actually evidence of the biblical flood. Which is an unnecessarily weak position to take when you have already accepted a perfectly unfalsifiable cop-out! The truth is that most of them don't want to think too hard about it.
Post reply on HN