Live data from Hacker News

Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

blog.chromium.org

21–30 of 78 posts

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#21
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't most people use chromium instead of chrome anyways on Linux?

most people just click the "internet" button and use whatever was already pre-installed.

I meant Linux users and chromium is the one that's already in the repos and doesn't need extra work. The default browser in most distros is Firefox

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#24
post #11

Looking forward to no longer having to patch glibc on my Linux phone just so I can watch YouTube or use Spotify.

Wait what, how is glibc patching related to YouTube and Spotify? Could you not watch YouTube using an arm64 build of Chromium or Firefox?

Spotify requires Widevine CDM to run, and Firefox doesn't come with Widevine on Debian-based distros. The .so hasn't been available on arm64 except for ChromeOS. You can rip the .so out of ChromeOS (that's what RaspberryPi OS did). But ChromeOS uses its own flavor of libc so a couple of patches to glibc are required.

Same thing with YouTube. A few months ago, YouTube started to require Widevine CDM if one uses the m.youtube.com site. I can't use the non-mobile site on my phone for performance issues, so I'm essentially locked into Widevine for watching YouTube, too.

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#25

Wait... weren't there many ARM Chromebooks already?

Sure, and when I worked at Google on Chromecast there was also that build of Chromium.

All of that is very different from The G actually providing a packaged official Chrome build, though. Which for some reason they couldn't be bothered to do before (Firefox exists though)

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#26
I recently switched to using an NVIDIA Spark as my primary workstation and lack of Chrome binaries for it are what finally pushed me to completely sever my relationship with Chrome and switch to Firefox.

Sorry, Google. Too late!

(Bonus: ad blocking properly works).

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#28
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait what, how is glibc patching related to YouTube and Spotify? Could you not watch YouTube using an arm64 build of Chromium or Firefox?

Spotify requires Widevine CDM to run, and Firefox doesn't come with Widevine on Debian-based distros. The .so hasn't been available on arm64 except for ChromeOS. You can rip the .so out of ChromeOS (that's what RaspberryPi OS did). But ChromeOS uses its own flavor of libc so a couple of patches to glibc are required. Same thing with YouTube. A few months ago, YouTube started to require Widevine CDM if one uses the m.…

Firefox pre-packaged for Ubuntu on my NVIDIA Spark has no problems with YouTube?

I guess it must be a snap, not a deb package, but... wouldn't that work?

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#29

I recently switched to using an NVIDIA Spark as my primary workstation and lack of Chrome binaries for it are what finally pushed me to completely sever my relationship with Chrome and switch to Firefox. Sorry, Google. Too late! (Bonus: ad blocking properly works).

What is it like using a Spark as a workstation?

Re: Bringing Chrome to ARM64 Linux Devices

#30
post #16

I have been waiting... so many years for this. Like, I figured it would never come. So happy to be wrong. Wonder if it will work well on Raspberry Pi and also if it will come with Hardware Video Acceleration out of the box.

I would have more faith in Raspberry Pi's own patched build of Chromium to do hardware acceleration properly on the Pi than I would have in Google's generic Chrome build.

But as far as i know, there has never been working HW accelerated video in their build of Chromium. But yeah, I guess you have point.
Post reply on HN