21–30 of 374 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can’t get past all the LLM-isms. Do people really not care about AI-slopifying their writing? It’s like learning about bad kerning, you see it everywhere.
I think you're just hallucinating because this does not come across as an AI article
These margins are far greater than the ones Dario has indicated during many of his recent podcasts appearances.
Aren't they losing money on the retail API pricing, too?
> ... comparisons to artificially low priced Chinese providers...
Yeah, no this article does not pass the sniff test.
Ok but so it does cost Cursor $5k per power-Cursor user?? Still seems pretty rough..
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can’t get past all the LLM-isms. Do people really not care about AI-slopifying their writing? It’s like learning about bad kerning, you see it everywhere.
I think you're just hallucinating because this does not come across as an AI article
“what X actually is”
“the X reality check”
Overuse of “real” and “genuine”:
> The real story is actually in the article. … And the real issue for Cursor … They have real "brand awareness", and they are genuinely better than the cheaper open weights models - for now at least. It's a real conundrum for them.
> … - these are genuinely massive expenses that dwarf inference costs.
This style just screams “Claude” to me.
I thought there was no moat in AI? Even being 10x costlier, Anthropic still doesn't have enough compute to meet demand.
Those "AI has no moat" opinions are going to be so wrong so soon.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can’t get past all the LLM-isms. Do people really not care about AI-slopifying their writing? It’s like learning about bad kerning, you see it everywhere.
I think you're just hallucinating because this does not come across as an AI article
How confident are you in the opus 4.6 model size? I've always assumed it was a beefier model with more active params that Qwen397B (17B active on the forward pass)
I'm sure Anthropic is making money off the API but I highly doubt it's 90% profit margins.
This is such a well-written essay. Every line revealed the answer to the immediate question I had just thought of
I can’t get past all the LLM-isms. Do people really not care about AI-slopifying their writing? It’s like learning about bad kerning, you see it everywhere.
Popular content is popular because it is above the threshold for average detection.
In a better world, platforms would empower defenders, by granting skilled human noticers flagging priority, and by adopting basic classifiers like Pangram.
Unfortunately, mainstream platforms have thus far not demonstrated strong interest in banning AI slop. This site in particular has actually taken moderation actions to unflag AI slop, in certain occasions...