Live data from Hacker News

The first airplane fatality

amusingplanet.com

21–30 of 35 posts

Re: The first airplane fatality

#21
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In fairness, quite a few failure modes for aircraft do not matter much if you are wearing a helmet or not.

You’d be surprised. Small aircraft crashes, if control is not lost before hitting the ground, are much more similar to car crashes than to large airliner crashes. For example, a recent “innovation” that saved a lot of lives was making shoulder belts (as opposed to lap only belts) standard.

Next up: airbags..!

Re: The first airplane fatality

#22
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Preferred like people today prefer their private jet? It cost more than your typical annual salary at the time. I just read that the trip was still a 5 day journey, involving 20+ stops and spinning that takeoff and landing roulette wheel quite a bit.. The novelty factor might have been just as big a deal as time savings. It was something cool to try as an ultra wealthy globe trotter.

I read that it is statistically more dangerous to fly on a private jet than a commercial one.

100 Americans can drive a car their whole life, and statistically one will die.

There is zero chance 100 people could fly private airplanes everyday for their whole life and only one dies. I suppose if you look at 100 skilled pilots flying private aircraft for 50 years daily.. still would be a lot worse

Re: The first airplane fatality

#23
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But not "non human-powered" flight? If Icarus flapped a little, that counts.

If you can’t maintain altitude without losing significant airspeed, you’re just falling.

Even if you maintain both you can still be falling (orbits!)

Re: The first airplane fatality

#25
post #7
post #5

After the crash, the Wright's built a new plane, the 1909 Military Flyer. It came back the next year to Ft. Myer and became the first plane, anywhere in the world, to be bought by a government (1). Orville Wright taught three Army officers to fly on that plane, and then, the Army being what it is, a fourth guy got a letter from Wright explaining how to fly and told "take this plane to San Antonio and teach yourself t…

#1 sounds like a dangerous incentive. But different times!

War sometimes involves a degree of danger.

Re: The first airplane fatality

#28
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you can’t maintain altitude without losing significant airspeed, you’re just falling.

Even if you maintain both you can still be falling (orbits!)

Gravitational orbits lose energy over time. Not really relevant on human timescales but interesting trivia if nothing else.

Re: The first airplane fatality

#29
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even if you maintain both you can still be falling (orbits!)

Gravitational orbits lose energy over time. Not really relevant on human timescales but interesting trivia if nothing else.

Due to friction? Or is it other physics?

Re: The first airplane fatality

#30
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gravitational orbits lose energy over time. Not really relevant on human timescales but interesting trivia if nothing else.

Due to friction? Or is it other physics?

Gravitational waves, though in the vast majority of case they are extremely weak.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave

Post reply on HN