21–25 of 25 posts
Unfortunately, parts of how AI produced texts are structured and formulated do match my natural voice, since it follows the classic patterns of writing. That sucks.
I am having a blast with this: https://github.com/samuelclay/hackersmacker I dropped into /new so that I can "foe" all the barf.
Reading opposing viewpoints is so important and is becoming a lost art in our society. I encourage you to understand and empathize with people you don't agree with. It will help all of us in the long run.
I've gravitated towards this: Code: ~100% LLM Communication: ~100% Me Communication isn't docs, docs are increasingly defined by more steering docs which are read by both LLM and humans; but for pure human consumption (e.g. email). I type them virtually 100%, this keep every sentence my own words.
Is code not a form of communication?
“Here’s what actually matters.” “Let’s break it down.” “The key takeaway is…” “The bottom line is…” “What this really means is…”
Also hearing this a lot:
“Here’s what nobody is talking about.” “Here’s the part people miss.” “What most people don’t realize is…”
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd personally prefer to see the version with worse grammar, because I know it was written by a real person. Do you find people respond better to your LLM-corrected posts, or is it mainly for your own comfort?
I do this as a teacher lol. I say just spell it how it sounds so i dont have to grade ai papers.