Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Last Statements

walzr.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: Last Statements

#21

Post by galkk »

ithkuil wrote: post #20
galkk wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don’t rephrase me so it’s easier to argue. I am not talking about generic inmates, who deserve all protection (“no cruel and unusual punishment”), I’m talking about people like ones from the website. Who did horrible stuff and were convicted to death for it. I’m sure that if needed, society can develop necessary framework (declare them “legally dead” or something like that).

I consider the risk of wrongful conviction to be an argument against the death penalty and for the very same reason I'm against performing any kind of inhuman treatment of them (which might be worse than death). Even if 95% would totally deserve it, I don't think we should just accept that on average 4 innocent people every year are just treated as subhumans just so we can unleash our wrath over those who did truly h…

There should be doubt. There should be due process.

At the same time, I think that with the advancement of the tech (surveillance cameras everywhere, dna tests, the cell tower triangulation and/or mobile device location tracking) there are cases when the guilt can be established without any doubt, and the overall chance of wrongful conviction will drop down.

Hell, have you read the website? One of those pieces of shit made his accomplice to video the murder on the phone.

Re: Last Statements

#22

Post by pinkmuffinere »

sam0x17 wrote: post #14
maest wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, those acts are immensely terrible and the apologies feel minuscule by comparison. But I think there's room for more nuance here. There are multiple reasons we put people in jail: 1. the victims can feel some vindication and retribution 2. other members of society can feel some vindication and retribution and a sense of justice 3. other would-be criminals are detered from committing similar crimes for fear of pun…

I've always felt very alone in my view on this, so don't feel bad if you disagree with me because most people probably do, but I just feel super morally icky when I hear about how part of our justice system is built around "retribution" / "vindication". Like it is one thing to punish, it is quite another to allow others to derive some sort of satisfaction from that punishment, even if they were victims, I just find i…

> it is quite another to allow others to derive some sort of satisfaction from that punishment

I sometimes see this behavior in close friends, and it totally changes the way I see them. I don't know if it's a moral failing on their part, but I just don't experience the desire for vengeance the same way they do, and it really scares me to see how they experience it. What will they do when they start to have mental decline, and (incorrectly) decide they were wronged in some way? :(

Re: Last Statements

#23

Post by ithkuil »

galkk wrote: post #21
ithkuil wrote: post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I consider the risk of wrongful conviction to be an argument against the death penalty and for the very same reason I'm against performing any kind of inhuman treatment of them (which might be worse than death). Even if 95% would totally deserve it, I don't think we should just accept that on average 4 innocent people every year are just treated as subhumans just so we can unleash our wrath over those who did truly h…

There should be doubt. There should be due process. At the same time, I think that with the advancement of the tech (surveillance cameras everywhere, dna tests, the cell tower triangulation and/or mobile device location tracking) there are cases when the guilt can be established without any doubt, and the overall chance of wrongful conviction will drop down. Hell, have you read the website? One of those pieces of shi…

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those convicted are rightfully convicted.

But paint me skeptical as to whether increased use of technology can actually improve the reliability of the proofs.

Imagine a world where deep fakes are much better quality but our system hasn't yet caught up to take that into proper consideration etc.

Serving for life is already a big deal as punishment goes. I'm just asking to not have experimental medical experiments on people. I'm not saying they should walk free

Re: Last Statements

#24

Post by worthless-trash »

sam0x17 wrote: post #14
maest wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, those acts are immensely terrible and the apologies feel minuscule by comparison. But I think there's room for more nuance here. There are multiple reasons we put people in jail: 1. the victims can feel some vindication and retribution 2. other members of society can feel some vindication and retribution and a sense of justice 3. other would-be criminals are detered from committing similar crimes for fear of pun…

I've always felt very alone in my view on this, so don't feel bad if you disagree with me because most people probably do, but I just feel super morally icky when I hear about how part of our justice system is built around "retribution" / "vindication". Like it is one thing to punish, it is quite another to allow others to derive some sort of satisfaction from that punishment, even if they were victims, I just find i…

I think this thought process is something that only people who have never been wronged can afford. There comes a time in life where the punishment must fit the crime, even if its only to make an example of the criminal.

Life is hard enough, we should deter crimes at every possibility, people are rarely punished for every evil they commit.

Re: Last Statements

#25

Post by burnt-resistor »

galkk wrote: post #10

The deeds are horrifying to read. You can do nothing wrong and die by hands of some piece of shit just because you were at wrong place at wrong time. follow up actions of some are even more sad and scary. Killing another human being meant nothing to some of murderers, like killing a fly. Those apologies are too little too late. Good riddance. I have no sympathy for them, and I’m all in for using those for involuntary…

The presumption and occasional assumption of justice system infallibility is breathtakingly arrogant. And then the bloodthirsty, heartless rabble that cheers on more pain and death without regard to actual guilt, incompetency, or innocence. Judge not ...

Re: Last Statements

#26

Post by galkk »

ithkuil wrote: post #23
galkk wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There should be doubt. There should be due process. At the same time, I think that with the advancement of the tech (surveillance cameras everywhere, dna tests, the cell tower triangulation and/or mobile device location tracking) there are cases when the guilt can be established without any doubt, and the overall chance of wrongful conviction will drop down. Hell, have you read the website? One of those pieces of shi…

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those convicted are rightfully convicted. But paint me skeptical as to whether increased use of technology can actually improve the reliability of the proofs. Imagine a world where deep fakes are much better quality but our system hasn't yet caught up to take that into proper consideration etc. Serving for life is already a big deal as punishment goes. I'm just asking to not have…

I was thinking about deep fakes and tech advancements. Yes, that will add doubts etc. but you know what? There always will be ways. If somebody was convicted in 2015 most likely there weren’t any deep fakes.

Let’s look at, let’s say, Apple and its tight control over entire hardware and software iPhone stack. Nothing prevents them to announce that starting from iPhone 19 they cryptographically sign the video to ensure that it’s authentic and, at least, the video and sound are what the camera saw. Pro cameras can do it, for Apple it’s even easier, more or less. I’m sure that even on this site there are experts who can design such system that is as secure as we expect from Apple devices. And that thing will slowly spread due to competitive pressures.

—-

Involuntarily drug testing was one of examples that I gave, and you seem to be against. To some it may be extreme, and I completely understand where you’re coming from. To me… as I said - for some examples from the side the murderers surely lost their human privilege. That comment summarized my feelings after reading the website in much more succinct form: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47302490#47305803

Killing 13 month infant, putting bleach on 20 yo gas station employee and setting her on fire, stranding female who was screaming for help during sa. Mate, if your kidney is compatible with someone who is in need, you made your choice way too long ago to have any right to say anything now. Or if there are other uses that will benefit society and humanity as a whole - they are allowed. You are guilty (without doubt and with clear evidence) and sentenced to death. Now you have same amount of rights as cadaver on the table, but probably more uses while you still breathing.

Re: Last Statements

#27

Post by burnt-resistor »

ithkuil wrote: post #23
galkk wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There should be doubt. There should be due process. At the same time, I think that with the advancement of the tech (surveillance cameras everywhere, dna tests, the cell tower triangulation and/or mobile device location tracking) there are cases when the guilt can be established without any doubt, and the overall chance of wrongful conviction will drop down. Hell, have you read the website? One of those pieces of shi…

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those convicted are rightfully convicted. But paint me skeptical as to whether increased use of technology can actually improve the reliability of the proofs. Imagine a world where deep fakes are much better quality but our system hasn't yet caught up to take that into proper consideration etc. Serving for life is already a big deal as punishment goes. I'm just asking to not have…

The US has executed around hundreds of innocent wrongly convicted people that we're mostly to pretty certain of. And it has thrown a significant fraction of the lives away of around a million who were either innocent or committed very minor infractions, and condemned millions more to near civil death to remain permanently banished from society... untold numbers of innocents swept up to feed the for-profits prison slave labor camps and prevent certain people from voting.

It's always naive, unlearned, horrible people who clamor for "deterrence" and "revenge" via "throw away the key" and executions. Like Trump and the Central Park Five.

Re: Last Statements

#29

Post by galkk »

burnt-resistor wrote: post #27
ithkuil wrote: post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those convicted are rightfully convicted. But paint me skeptical as to whether increased use of technology can actually improve the reliability of the proofs. Imagine a world where deep fakes are much better quality but our system hasn't yet caught up to take that into proper consideration etc. Serving for life is already a big deal as punishment goes. I'm just asking to not have…

The US has executed around hundreds of innocent wrongly convicted people that we're mostly to pretty certain of. And it has thrown a significant fraction of the lives away of around a million who were either innocent or committed very minor infractions, and condemned millions more to near civil death to remain permanently banished from society... untold numbers of innocents swept up to feed the for-profits prison sla…

95% of your text has nothing to do with what I said and the issue being discussed.

Invoking Trump (that I don’t care about, especially in the context of this conversation) is so cheap... I suggest you to go straight to Godwin law and compare me to literal Hitler, because that’s the quality of your argument (lack of there of, to be precise).

Post reply on HN