Live data from Hacker News

Graphing how the 10k* most common English words define each other

wyattsell.com

21–27 of 27 posts

Re: Graphing how the 10k* most common English words define each other

#21
Nice! Reminds me a bit of "WordWeb" which is still around:

https://wordweb.info/free/

which also uses WordNet:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordNet

(which this is also using)

which was developed by Princeton w/ DARPA money as an early investigation into AI and so forth.

Re: Graphing how the 10k* most common English words define each other

#22
I remember thinking about this when the semantic web was first being discussed. If you think of it from the perceptive of a child, your first 'foundational' words are learned though direct experience. Then while you continue to learn words this way, we can also use those words we 'know' to define secondary or tertiary terms that we have no direct experience of. I'd like to see a graph like this with someones take on the minimum number of necessary foundational words and how that graph would look.

Re: Graphing how the 10k* most common English words define each other

#23
post #22

I remember thinking about this when the semantic web was first being discussed. If you think of it from the perceptive of a child, your first 'foundational' words are learned though direct experience. Then while you continue to learn words this way, we can also use those words we 'know' to define secondary or tertiary terms that we have no direct experience of. I'd like to see a graph like this with someones take on…

> If you think of it from the perceptive of a child, your first 'foundational' words are learned through direct experience.

And lest we (or AGI) forget, there's qualia in the foundations.

Re: Graphing how the 10k* most common English words define each other

#27
post #20
post #9

If you like this, you would probably enjoy Princeton Wordnet. They have unfortunately stopped developing it. You can still browse it a bit online with some 3rd party sites: https://en-word.net/

The page literally credits "Open English Wordnet" (based on it) in the sidebar :) (the link is broken though, it should be https://github.com/globalwordnet/english-wordnet )

fixed, thanks for pointing that out.
Post reply on HN