Live data from Hacker News

If AI has a bright future, why does AI think it doesn't?

claude.ai

21–23 of 23 posts

Re: If AI has a bright future, why does AI think it doesn't?

#21

I made this comment half a year ago as well, but i believe AI is going to bring down the profitability of the big tech companies by a lot. Instead of massive scaling advantages which has given software its extreme valuation, it now hit on something that is almost a perfect commodity. Energy and depreciation are easy to calculate and its subject to global competition. Great for consumers, less so for people looking fo…

I worked at yahoo during its (in retrospect) decline.

It used to be hard to be "web scale" and available, now that's either k8s or a few checkboxes in AWS.

Yahoo used to be able to "coast" on the compellingness of their services because 80% attractive with 100% available and 100% global reach crushes 90% attractive with 95% available and 25% global reach.

I was often confused by the hyperfocus of analysts asking "Is Y! a tech company or a content company?"

What they were really asking was if we should be valuing Yahoo! as 30%+ margin on putting ads next to Yahoo! News articles, or 10x multiplier on originating GMail/Search?

I think "data is the only moat", and in a way that goes back to the "first to market / eBay" POV, and the difference between first to market and fast follower is super interesting!

Re: If AI has a bright future, why does AI think it doesn't?

#23
post #18
post #2

Those who think Gary Marcus, Ed Zitron and Yann LeCunn are wrong, and believe in AI: How do you reconcile things when AI thinks the market is highly likely to collapse? Quote: "The entire system only works if AI revenue grows fast enough to outrun the obsolescence treadmill. For that to happen, Microsoft would need approximately $130 billion per year in new AI revenue, Google $100 billion, Amazon $120 billion, and Me…

From skimming that chat: it doesn't, no matter how much you tried to steer it into that direction. It barely reluctantly agreed under some hypotheticals, but it never agreed to the hypotheticals actually being true. This submission is junk, and the the title is editorialized. Direct reply from Claude: https://claude.ai/share/628e6a1d-087d-4454-95e3-cf8a3c4a5b72 "The case for a bright future is strong." I trust Claude…

Ha. Try again
Post reply on HN