[flagged]
We Will Not Be Divided
21–30 of 912 posts
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#22I hope Anthropic will survive this. If they don’t it will just be perfect proof that you cannot be both moral and successful in the US.
>> you cannot be both moral and successful in the US.
I assumed the use of massive scraped datasets, with copyrighted material and without consent, to train large AI models, had already established this.
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#23[flagged]
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#24Does this mean there is a non zero chance we will get some kind of grok+chinese model mix that's used across the entire US military? Ironic isn't it.
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#25They should be collecting signatures from employees at xAI. I think they're probably most likely to fill the space left by Anthropic.
Everyone knows anyone who signs this from xAI will be a former employee by tomorrow.
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#26No problem! The DoD^HW will just use DeepSeek! (I wish this were a joke)
They've already been using Signal - which is "commercial" app, meaning it's not meant to be used like that - for top-secret (or at least highly sensitive) military communications during the military strikes on Yemen. If that was fake, I apologise, I was deceived. I wouldn't be surprised if things turned out that way again, to be honest. That's something to be expected, actually (IMO).
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#27I hope Anthropic will survive this. If they don’t it will just be perfect proof that you cannot be both moral and successful in the US.
[flagged]
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#28They should be collecting signatures from employees at xAI. I think they're probably most likely to fill the space left by Anthropic.
There is a specific kind of person that joins xAI over the other companies and it is definitely not a moral one.
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#29They should be collecting signatures from employees at xAI. I think they're probably most likely to fill the space left by Anthropic.
[dead]
Re: We Will Not Be Divided
#30You’re kinda already conceding to some of your opponents points when you use legally invalid names like “Department of War” I appreciate the sentiment but don’t preconcede to your opposition by using their framing.
[dead]