Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
21–30 of 1001 posts
Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#22The worst part of this is if they do remove Claude, and probably GPT, and Gemini soon after because of outcry we are going to be left with our military using fucking Grok as their model, a model that not even on par with open source Chinese models.
Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#23Props to Dario and Anthropic for taking a moral stand. A rarity in tech these days.
This is not how the word "moral" should be used in a sentence that also has the name Dario Amodei in it.
Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#24Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#25Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#26Props to Dario and Anthropic for taking a moral stand. A rarity in tech these days.
Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#27Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#28Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#29The worst part of this is if they do remove Claude, and probably GPT, and Gemini soon after because of outcry we are going to be left with our military using fucking Grok as their model, a model that not even on par with open source Chinese models.
Re: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War
#30The worst part of this is if they do remove Claude, and probably GPT, and Gemini soon after because of outcry we are going to be left with our military using fucking Grok as their model, a model that not even on par with open source Chinese models.
It's better than actively aiding them. Make them struggle at every turn.