...But it can be hard to tell the difference between content that’s been
AI-generated, and content created without AI.
Pro-Tip: Something like that Sherbet colored dog is always AI generatedSynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
21–30 of 81 posts
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#22I genuinely feel that in this AI world we need the inverse. That every analogue or digital photo taken by traditional means of photography will need to be signed by a certificate, so anyone can verify its authenticity.
And how do you fix the analog hole? Because if you can point your "verified" camera at a sufficiently high-resolution screen, we're worse off than when we started.
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#23...But it can be hard to tell the difference between content that’s been AI-generated, and content created without AI. Pro-Tip: Something like that Sherbet colored dog is always AI generated
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
And how do you fix the analog hole? Because if you can point your "verified" camera at a sufficiently high-resolution screen, we're worse off than when we started.
Or just extract the certificate from the hardware you own.
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
And how do you fix the analog hole? Because if you can point your "verified" camera at a sufficiently high-resolution screen, we're worse off than when we started.
Or just extract the certificate from the hardware you own.
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#26I genuinely feel that in this AI world we need the inverse. That every analogue or digital photo taken by traditional means of photography will need to be signed by a certificate, so anyone can verify its authenticity.
And how do you fix the analog hole? Because if you can point your "verified" camera at a sufficiently high-resolution screen, we're worse off than when we started.
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#27I genuinely feel that in this AI world we need the inverse. That every analogue or digital photo taken by traditional means of photography will need to be signed by a certificate, so anyone can verify its authenticity.
I'm sure Apple would love that too. More seriously, would that also mean all editing tools would need to re-sign a photo that was previously signed by the original sensor. How do we distinguish an edit that's misleading vs just changing levels? It's an interesting area for sure, but this inverse approach seems much trickier.
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#28I genuinely feel that in this AI world we need the inverse. That every analogue or digital photo taken by traditional means of photography will need to be signed by a certificate, so anyone can verify its authenticity.
And how do you fix the analog hole? Because if you can point your "verified" camera at a sufficiently high-resolution screen, we're worse off than when we started.
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#29What incentive do open models have to adopt this?
Re: SynthID: A tool to watermark and identify content generated through AI
#30[1] Specifically, "...synthetic audio, image, video or text content, shall ensure that the outputs of the AI system are marked in a machine-readable format and detectable as artificially generated or manipulated", see https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/50/