The main benefits of intermittent fasting are not in weight loss, but:
- Give your bowels the time to run the "cleaning program" (rumbling) - Reduce inflammation
21–30 of 65 posts
The main benefits of intermittent fasting are not in weight loss, but:
- Give your bowels the time to run the "cleaning program" (rumbling) - Reduce inflammation
Any framework that causes an overwieght person to genuinely pay attention to what they eat will have a weight loss impact, because all you have to do to lose weight is eat less. The wide variety of dieting techniques are a good thing because it maximizes the likelihood that any individual will find a framework that induces them to pay attention to their eating habits.
I've gone through many weight loss cycles using various techniques including OMAD. Eating once a day changes your relationship with food, and disrupting that relationship is a thousand times more important than whatever obscure biological processes the fitness gurus suppose are in play.
In a couple of days ~2 billion people world-wide will begin intermittent fasting, done from dawn to sunset, for a month, which is one of the components of the month of Ramadan. Nobody does this to lose weight, or even changes their diet, yet everyone loses some weight. 5lb is typical. Most people who fast Ramadan also gain it back afterward because they didn't make any changes to their diet, which points to the effec…
However, there's more than weight. I wonder if Ramadan has a lasting impact on blood sugar stability, for example.
> Intermittent fasting may make little difference to weight loss. My personal experience is quite the opposite. In fact, this is the first time I have heard anybody claim that intermittent fasting, when done correctly, does not make you lose weight. Sounds like a study done by people who sell weight-loss drugs or meals. Intermittent fasting is one of the more reliable ways to lose weight.
Methods like intermittent fasting work by providing a framework that makes it easier for people to achieve that.
Also, assertions in support of consumption should be reviewed to make sure it's not put forward into media and study by consumptionists.
It's clear that given the same calorie input, there is little difference. The main benefits of intermittent fasting are not in weight loss, but: - Give your bowels the time to run the "cleaning program" (rumbling) - Reduce inflammation
> Intermittent fasting may make little difference to weight loss. My personal experience is quite the opposite. In fact, this is the first time I have heard anybody claim that intermittent fasting, when done correctly, does not make you lose weight. Sounds like a study done by people who sell weight-loss drugs or meals. Intermittent fasting is one of the more reliable ways to lose weight.
You lose weight by reducing calories intake. That's well known and what the review, unsurprisingly, has shown. Methods like intermittent fasting work by providing a framework that makes it easier for people to achieve that.
I mostly ride bikes for exercise and need fuel at least every hour on a ride or else I will bonk out. My output is 500kcal/hour based on power meter, a 4 hour ride would be 2000kcal, it's not doable without some food intake.