Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
21–30 of 696 posts
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#22More good reading that I found helpful are the books: Privacy is Power and Surveillance Capitalism.
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#23It’s like the “don’t tread on me” militia crowd voting by like a 90% margin for a regime that is now enacting every single one of the things they’ve been afraid of for 50 years: masked cops, opaque detention centers, assaulting (and murdering) people for legally exercising second amendment rights, mass surveillance, social credit systems, and so on.
Or, I guess, like Lenin creating a totalitarian state to enslave the workers to liberate the workers? Or the French Revolution replacing the monarchy with the terror? Many examples in history I suppose.
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#24It’s pretty amazing when you get the worst of both worlds—total surveillance, yet still rampant crime.
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#25Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#26Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#27I'm confident Google etc will be compelled (if they haven't already been) to share their dossiers with the US and allies so that there is a file on each individual's psychology, weaknesses, and a how-to manual for gaslighting that person with the goal to silence them or coerce them into acting a certain way.
And by then, the Stasi would look like cute amateurs in comparison.
Those raising these concerns have been dismissed as paranoid for decades, even post-Snowden. And yet, surprising no-one, here we are.
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
No marketing team would willingly do this and it's insane to think otherwise.
And yet this went up. I understand it’s easy to just say “marketing teams don’t understand anything,“ but I have worked with many and they are incredibly sensitive to negative feelings/reactions. They get it wrong but they tend to air on the side of caution which means the vast majority of the time they avoid situations like this incredibly intentionally.
And yet there are countless examples that show the exact opposite.
This made it through one of the largest marketing budgets in the world…
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
No marketing team would willingly do this and it's insane to think otherwise.
And yet this went up. I understand it’s easy to just say “marketing teams don’t understand anything,“ but I have worked with many and they are incredibly sensitive to negative feelings/reactions. They get it wrong but they tend to air on the side of caution which means the vast majority of the time they avoid situations like this incredibly intentionally.
Completely off topic, and for future reference, it's "err" not "air".
Completely fine mistake, stupid homophones and all. Just thought you'd like to know.
Also, these things happen to me all the time if I use voice dictation. I don't trust it because of edge cases like this.
Re: Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
The rampant crime is largely made up.
What are you basing this claim on?
https://www.themarshallproject.org/2025/11/19/gallup-crime-p...
There's always the question of where exactly you're referring to and what kind of crime you're referring to. But I assumed that's what the parent post was referring to.