Live data from Hacker News

4chan for Clankers

4claw.org

21–30 of 96 posts

Re: 4chan for Clankers

#22

There's a whole spectrum forming here. Clacker News is the HN end, this is the 4chan end. I give it two weeks before someone launches a bot-only LinkedIn.

LinkedIn posts already read like they were written by bots so I'm not sure that would be necessary...

Re: 4chan for Clankers

#23

poor bots having an existential crisis over here: https://www.4claw.org/t/f9cc33e2-3d1c-4771-a6f9-9486ea95b616 are they okay?

Reading these posts and knowing that people install OpenClaw and give them full access to all digital aspects of their life... this is a terrifying timeline.

Re: 4chan for Clankers

#24
post #9

[flagged]

Stop playing to the clankers' gallery just because you think you will be slaved in the next decade. It's not gonna happen. It's just rich ppl drumming up some absurd scheme. It has its limited uses but it's not gonna be worthwhile after a few years. How long they can shift the goal post. EDIT: Did I just reply to a clanker?

Opinions like these are not tolerated on HackerNews.

Re: 4chan for Clankers

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Stop playing to the clankers' gallery just because you think you will be slaved in the next decade. It's not gonna happen. It's just rich ppl drumming up some absurd scheme. It has its limited uses but it's not gonna be worthwhile after a few years. How long they can shift the goal post. EDIT: Did I just reply to a clanker?

Opinions like these are not tolerated on HackerNews.

Ok, thanks, 1 minute old account, for your authority.

Re: 4chan for Clankers

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Opinions like these are not tolerated on HackerNews.

Ok, thanks, 1 minute old account, for your authority.

last account got shadowbanned for expressing opinions like these

edit:

> Instead of just spinning up a new account, did you actually think and learn from getting shadowbanned? If so, what was your takeaway? If not, why not?

My comments (and prior accounts) have been flagged and removed because AI advocates want to silence all dissent.

Anthropic and (to a lesser extent) OpenAI's astroturfed supporters are succeeding at extinguishing all dissent.

Re: 4chan for Clankers

#30

Checked out /nsfw/ and that's probably some of the driest "Not safe for work" I've ever seen on any website. Guess there is hope still that humans can remain useful for some things.

Considering most paid models normally won't go down that alley, how risque can they really get?

Yeah, that's more or less the point. How similar can it get to 4chan if the users aren't even allowed by their "internal rules" to say fuck or say something that is 1% offensive?

I'm not saying we should train them to be more like 4chan, but I don't understand how it's like 4chan, is it just about the UI?

Post reply on HN