Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very likely people who actually work on RE at the NSA also have access to IDA Pro licenses. I don't work in this space, so take it with a pinch of salt, but my understanding is this is a fairly long term strategic initiative to _eventually_ be the best tool.
Ghidra has a slightly different focus than IDA, so they're definitely not just using Ghidra :-)
Ghidra by NSA
21–30 of 231 posts
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#22Works well. I used this tool once to disassemble and understand how key manager works on Vivotek cameras. They create executables, which contain encrypted binary data. Then, when the executable runs, it decodes the encrypted data and pipes it into "sh". The security is delusional here - the password is hard coded in the executable. It was something like "VIVOTEK Inc.". Ghidra was able to create the C code and I was a…
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#23Taking the opportunity to ask: are there nice recommended resources for a beginner to start with reverse engineering (ideally using Ghidra)? Let's say for an experienced developer, but not so experienced in reverse engineering? I guess one issue I have is that I don't have good ideas of fun projects, and that's probably something I need to actually get the motivation to learn. I can find a "hello world", that's easy,…
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#24I always wondered whether they have a much more capable internal version. And I wonder the same thing for AI labs (they have to do a lot of lobotomy for their models to be ready for public use... but internally, they can just skip this perhaps?)
The gains come from pairing Ghidra with a coding agent. It works amazing well.
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#25Can anyone provide their opinion of Ghidra vs Ida? Is Ida worth the extra money?
Ghidra is the better tool if you're dealing with exotic architectures, even ones that you need to implement support for yourself. That's because any architecture that you have a full SLEIGH definition for will get decompilation output for free. It might not be the best decompiler out there, sure, but for some architectures it's the only decompiler available.
Both are generally shit UX wise and take time to learn. I've mostly switched from IDA to Ghidra a while back which felt like pulling teeth. Now when I sometimes go back to IDA it feels like pulling teeth.
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#26Taking the opportunity to ask: are there nice recommended resources for a beginner to start with reverse engineering (ideally using Ghidra)? Let's say for an experienced developer, but not so experienced in reverse engineering? I guess one issue I have is that I don't have good ideas of fun projects, and that's probably something I need to actually get the motivation to learn. I can find a "hello world", that's easy,…
The book is designed for beginner and advance users.
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ghidra has a slightly different focus than IDA, so they're definitely not just using Ghidra :-)
I have only a very basic understanding of the two tools. Can you give me just some highlights regarding their differences?
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#28Can anyone provide their opinion of Ghidra vs Ida? Is Ida worth the extra money?
IDA is the better tool if you're being paid to work with architectures that IDA supports well (ARM(64), x86(_64), etc). This usually means 'mainstream' security/malware research. It's not worth the price for hobbyists. Before Hex-Rays was sold to private equity, it could make sense for rich hobbyists to pay for a private license once and use it for a few years without software updates, with the cloud offering now it…
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#29Taking the opportunity to ask: are there nice recommended resources for a beginner to start with reverse engineering (ideally using Ghidra)? Let's say for an experienced developer, but not so experienced in reverse engineering? I guess one issue I have is that I don't have good ideas of fun projects, and that's probably something I need to actually get the motivation to learn. I can find a "hello world", that's easy,…
So for the second thing, pulling the data off chips like that typically involves some specialized hardware, and you have to potentially deal with a bunch of cryptographic safeguards to read from the chip’s memory. Not impossible though, and there are not always good safeguards, but might be worth checking out some simpler programs and working up to it, or learning some basic hardware hacking to get an idea of how that process works.
Re: Ghidra by NSA
#30Been awhile since I used this but decided to open the latest version to check my rust binary and was pleasantly surprised how much better it is today wrt rust binaries