"software engineers will spend less time on routine coding—and more on interacting with customers" Ahh, what could possibly go wrong!
IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
21–30 of 309 posts
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#22Bold move. Not because it's wrong, but because it risks initiating the collapse of the AI bubble and the whole "AI is gonna replace all skilled work, any day now, just give us another billion". Seems like IBM can no longer wait for that day.
I mean it’s IBM. On average, 70% of their decisions are bad ones. Not sure I’d pay a single bit of attention to what they do.
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#23"software engineers will spend less time on routine coding—and more on interacting with customers" Ahh, what could possibly go wrong!
Why is that bad? You write better code when you actually understand the business domain and the requirement. It's much easier to understand it when you get it direct from the source than filtered down through dozens of product managers and JIRA tickets.
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#24Bold move. Not because it's wrong, but because it risks initiating the collapse of the AI bubble and the whole "AI is gonna replace all skilled work, any day now, just give us another billion". Seems like IBM can no longer wait for that day.
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#25Bold move. Not because it's wrong, but because it risks initiating the collapse of the AI bubble and the whole "AI is gonna replace all skilled work, any day now, just give us another billion". Seems like IBM can no longer wait for that day.
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#26Bold move. Not because it's wrong, but because it risks initiating the collapse of the AI bubble and the whole "AI is gonna replace all skilled work, any day now, just give us another billion". Seems like IBM can no longer wait for that day.
I mean it’s IBM. On average, 70% of their decisions are bad ones. Not sure I’d pay a single bit of attention to what they do.
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#27Bold move. Not because it's wrong, but because it risks initiating the collapse of the AI bubble and the whole "AI is gonna replace all skilled work, any day now, just give us another billion". Seems like IBM can no longer wait for that day.
Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#28Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#29Re: IBM tripling entry-level jobs after finding the limits of AI adoption
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
And if it is for consulting, I doubt very serious they will based in the US. You can’t be priced competitive hiring an entry level consultant in the US and no company is willing to pay the bill rate for US based entry level consultants unless their email address is @amazon.com or @google.com. Source: current (full time) staff consultant at a third party cloud consulting firm and former consultant (full time) at Amazo…
Why would Amazon bring on a full-time consultant instead of just hiring you?