Not a single mention of Trump. Really fucking impressive journalism.
[flagged]
Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
21–30 of 163 posts
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Respectfully, you also said that "we now know " that taking the COVID19 vaccine could have killed you earlier today, which is completely false. I don't think you are getting your news from reliable sources, and I see this comment as further evidence of that. I'm sure there's lots of information on 4chan about the identity of mass shooters, and that some of it is accurate, but most of it is probably wild speculation,…
To be honest, my working heuristic for over a decade now has been to assume that if someone openly admits to reading 4chan without any hesitation, caveats, or embarrassment, they can quite likely be lumped in with a general basket of deplorables.
Is it totally fair? No. Is it reasonably high probability? IMO, yes. Is there likely information value on 4chan that could be difficult to find elsewhere? Probably. Is it worth my time and aggravation to sort through it? No.
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#23Jack Blanchard in the Politico podcast (almost as good as Odd Lots if you're fine with listening to stuff at 2x speed on commutes) remarked that one of the most important aspects of the response to the publicization of the first 2% of the Epstein Files is that it may be a watershed moment where the better parts of citizen journalism have become completely competitive with institutional journalism, due heavily to the…
Institutional journalism has done everything in its power to kill this story for 7 years. You don't need a fast turnaround time when the fourth estate is also busy protecting the wealthy. Note how we have all the goods on Matt Gaetz and everyone just conveniently forgot about him because daddy knows who to buy off. DOJ has all the time to pursue rinky dink charges against Letitia James for what would be at best a losing civil case by her lender but we can't go after a known sex trafficker with good connections.
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#24How low we have become to do nothing about it? No arrests no convictions?
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your distress may be related to your low standard of alarm. There's no evidence that Seinfeld replied let alone accepted.
Go look at the photos and tell me that everyone is overreacting. If anything people are under reacting. After the 3-4th blacked out little girl showing her genitals so they can be sold, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that if someone is connected to the island they need to be thoroughly investigated. That’s not a stretch. Replies like yours are what’s sick downplaying the most prolific industrial child rape in…
I haven't seen those photos. Are they so bad that they justify smearing someone who was only mentioned in a huge trove and regardless of context? Will I go into a righteous omnidirectional rage if I see them too?
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#26Jack Blanchard in the Politico podcast (almost as good as Odd Lots if you're fine with listening to stuff at 2x speed on commutes) remarked that one of the most important aspects of the response to the publicization of the first 2% of the Epstein Files is that it may be a watershed moment where the better parts of citizen journalism have become completely competitive with institutional journalism, due heavily to the…
The amount of breathless conclusion jumping from citizen journalists has been completely bananas as well. I had to tell a friend of mine to take a break from it. The level of tinfoil hat theories (example: cannibalism) which people are now taking as the truth off of which to build more theories is really something. The unfortunate thing is - in our current environment, the crazy speculation and knowingly dealing in j…
> The amount of breathless conclusion jumping from citizen journalists has been completely bananas as well.
I saw a video on Instagram claiming (or at least insinuating) that Epstein had access to all of Lifetouch's photos, because "the company is in the Epstein files!". Turns out, it was a single line item for $109 in what looked like banking records. In comparison, that same selection of files mentioned Whole Foods ~250 times.
For those outside the US, Lifetouch does school photos for about half the schools in the US (or something like that) so you can understand how that's a thread that conspiracy theorists can pull on. But there's nothing there. Just a single payment to the company in a sea of thousands and thousands of normal, every day purchases.
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#27Not a single mention of Trump. Really fucking impressive journalism.
[flagged]
Trump is mentioned about a million times, according to the (less redacted) docs searched by a congressman.
Much of that is probably the news articles and gossip Epstein was known to circulate as the walls were closing in. Still, their friendship goes back decades and they were neighbors both in NYC and Florida.
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#28How low we have become to do nothing about it? No arrests no convictions?
Pam Bondi said if the DOJ went after everyone the whole system would collapse is why.
Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#29Re: Inside Epstein’s network: what 1.4M emails reveal
#30Not a single mention of Trump. Really fucking impressive journalism.
[flagged]
Kept his distance? His name appears in the files, and this is not an exaggeration, over one million times.
https://www.axios.com/2026/02/10/trump-epstein-files-jamie-r...