Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
21–30 of 331 posts
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#22[flagged]
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#23Meaning they’ll wait until about June and then quietly roll it out
Yep. Anyone got alternatives? I love the convenience of a video doorbell but I really really would like to not help the police or ICE or anyone else for that matter unless I decide it's a good idea.
I dont understand why anyone chooses Ring when the costs of Unifi are so much better.
The ring app also sucks imo and all their hardware is quite slow.
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you elaborate? This is interesting
I worked across several facilities and obviously cannot talk specifics about those. It is public knowledge that one of them housed a large metro area's main ISP "meet-me room." During Snowden revelations I'd already been apprenticing for years; nothing Edward documented surprised me . I'd literally walk around our 500,000sqft elevated floors knodding my head [none of this exists, officially] . ---- Nothing is as it s…
I run grey man where I can. Stuff that's private stays private. Paper and physical security is still good.
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#25Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#26This is a temporary rollback while there’s a choice to speak against it. Cloud connected doorbells must die as well as dragnet surveillance.
Could a solution be forcing Amazon (and Google and Flock and...) to open their backend software either for self-hosting or for running on somebody else's "cloud"? So subscribing to such a device isn't that different from getting web hosting from Dreamhost or Hetzner?
Maybe there's a host or IP field in the settings that users can easily change?
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#27Meaning they’ll wait until about June and then quietly roll it out
Yep. Anyone got alternatives? I love the convenience of a video doorbell but I really really would like to not help the police or ICE or anyone else for that matter unless I decide it's a good idea.
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#28Meaning they’ll wait until about June and then quietly roll it out
Yep. Anyone got alternatives? I love the convenience of a video doorbell but I really really would like to not help the police or ICE or anyone else for that matter unless I decide it's a good idea.
Re: Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety after surveillance backlash
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep. Anyone got alternatives? I love the convenience of a video doorbell but I really really would like to not help the police or ICE or anyone else for that matter unless I decide it's a good idea.
you can use a company that is self hosted like Unifi and have complete control over your data, still have remote access, and not pay a subscription. “self hosted” scares people off but its literally a box you plug in and forget about. Pretty trivial. I dont understand why anyone chooses Ring when the costs of Unifi are so much better. The ring app also sucks imo and all their hardware is quite slow.