Live data from Hacker News

Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

blog.nuclearsecrecy.com

21–30 of 73 posts

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#22
post #8

Plausible; also marginal. We already knew that Edward Teller made these kinds of accusations against a lot of people and thereby did much greater harm.

Are you alleging that the FBI interviewer unknowingly interviewed Teller who was posing, with a high degree of skill, as a woman known to be closely associated with Feynman? Because the FBI interviewer refers to the interviewee with feminine pronouns.

admittedly it would be really funny if Teller could just do that

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#23
The problem with extremely smart people is not many people understand them. They're typically going to be non-conformist in any event, and may come across as arrogant if they have an intricate belief system that you may not take the time to understand. I'd think one of the greatest scientists of a generation would have the kind of depth of thinking that few would understand. Having listened to many of his interviews (unfortunately I'm too young to have witnessed these things in real time) he comes across as one of the most eloquent people I can think of.

While reading through that I was suspecting it was perhaps a peer that was envious of Feynman, but an ex (scorned?) partner is extremely plausible.

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#25

(2014) Relevant because since then it's become quite trendy to throw mud at men like him.

Feynman really deserves it though: [0]. I admit to being part of the problem here, because in the 2000s and 2010s, I was in the Feynman cult with everyone else, but once you dig a little deeper under the quirky anecdotes (many of which are probably fictional), it’s clear he was kind of a scumbag and a lot of his reputation is whitewashing by what we’d now call fanboys. If his wife did write that memo, I’d say she had…

The stuff that the material in Feynman's book is not his is just made up nonsense. They follow his course lectures very very closely. The minutiae of writing may not be his, but the material certainly was his.

Regarding domestic abuse charges, this was before we had no fault divorce. It was common at that time to make up charges of abuse, often in concert with the lawyers of both parties just to ensure that divorce is granted.

So it is not a clear open and shut case at all.

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#26

The problem with extremely smart people is not many people understand them. They're typically going to be non-conformist in any event, and may come across as arrogant if they have an intricate belief system that you may not take the time to understand. I'd think one of the greatest scientists of a generation would have the kind of depth of thinking that few would understand. Having listened to many of his interviews…

> The problem with extremely smart people is not many people understand them. They're typically going to be non-conformist in any event, and may come across as arrogant if they have an intricate belief system that you may not take the time to understand.

This is the bucket Ayn Rand falls into. Her philosophy is radically different, revolutionizing the entire field, to the point that most people can’t even grasp that the things she questions are open to debate.

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#28

(2014) Relevant because since then it's become quite trendy to throw mud at men like him.

Not entirely without reason though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKpj2ISQAc

That video is such an extremely weak argument. Sure Feynman probably has more fame than he is merited. But he is still one of the most influential physicists. He just also happened to be entertaining and wrote some books. Personality and self-marketing makes a difference, welcome to society.

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#29

(2014) Relevant because since then it's become quite trendy to throw mud at men like him.

Not entirely without reason though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKpj2ISQAc

I cannot take seriously someone pretending that Feynman was a sham

Re: Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not entirely without reason though. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwKpj2ISQAc

That video is such an extremely weak argument. Sure Feynman probably has more fame than he is merited. But he is still one of the most influential physicists. He just also happened to be entertaining and wrote some books. Personality and self-marketing makes a difference, welcome to society.

[flagged]
Post reply on HN