New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
21–30 of 861 posts
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#22It's not illegal to make your own firearm, you just can't sell it.
Also in NY it's illegal to make an unserialized firearm. I have no idea what the serialization requirements are there, but what California did was require you report them to DROS.
Also, federally, not legal advice -- but I'm not aware there's any law against selling it. You just can't manufacture it for the purpose of sale or transfer. If it is incidentally sold later it's just like any other firearm without a serial number that's also legal (namely those manufactured commercially before the GCA, or those manufactured non-commercially by private persons after the GCA). I've seen the claim "can't transfer or sell it" over and over on all kind of gun forums etc but no one has ever been able to point where that is blanket illegal.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#23I don't think they know what Ctrl+Alt+Delete means. They want to restart it? They want to go to the screen where you can switch users or sign out? Do they think it's just a fancier way of saying delete?
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#24I don't think they know what Ctrl+Alt+Delete means. They want to restart it? They want to go to the screen where you can switch users or sign out? Do they think it's just a fancier way of saying delete?
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#25Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#26Why would I bother with an unreliable 3D printed zip gun and 3D printing when I can go and get a real working gun off the street for a few hundred? Edit, reading further it's even more insane: > The New York definitions sweep in not just FDM and resin printers, but also CNC mills and “any machine capable of making three-dimensional modifications to an object from a digital design file using subtractive manufacturing.…
Is that true in New York? Maybe it currently requires permits, so at least there is a log and provenance chain someone could use in case it's used for bad stuff? Sounds like if you'd want to avoid that (like if you wanna shot a CEO and get away with it for example), you could use a offline 3D printer.
The implication with this type of argument is that if someone is willing to break the law against murder, they'd be willing/able to break the laws around legally purchasing or owning a gun.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#27I don't think they know what Ctrl+Alt+Delete means. They want to restart it? They want to go to the screen where you can switch users or sign out? Do they think it's just a fancier way of saying delete?
This is more like installing anti-virus on your 3d printer.
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#28But not CNC machines?
The stupidest thing is you can go to another state and buy a gun in Walmart, why even bother to build a plastic gun in the US?
Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#29Re: New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers
#30This will cause 3D printer usability to go down massively. A bit like the multicolored tracking dots - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots that causes the driver to tell you "you can't print black and white as you're out of yellow".