25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
21–30 of 42 posts
Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#22I took a bit of a more unorthodox approach when I got tagged. I figure it's better to make notes worth reading: http://unalone.tumblr.com/post/75897218/continuing-my-facebo... Most people aren't funny, they aren't insightful, and they share way too much. Facebook is a loose social network; a "friend" on Facebook might translate to someone you'd barely recognize in real life. This is a problem inherent with any group.…
My opinion of Time and Newsweek has been consistently low for about 15 years. When I was in high school, I thought they were "serious" newsweeklies. I went so far as to keep a crate of them my library was discarding, with some vague idea of having them around for 'future reference' (mind you this was pre-web). Then, sometime in college, I picked one up and realized that it was essentially just a printed version of TV…
Though Newsweek didn't use to have a "humiliated people of the week" column, and "conventional wisdom watch" used to seem interesting rather than just sniping. And I did like the quotes of the week page.
Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#23Has every sentence on Time site have a suggested link???? Some arent even related to the article. What annoyance!. The article??? oh, a rant as this comment. (at least this one is shorter)
Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#24Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#25Yet another article that complains about Facebook or something on Facebook ... that has a button on bottom to post the article on Facebook.
Press here to post this message on facebook!
Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#26Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? This counts as journalism these days? No, but it counts as selling eyeballs to advertisers, which is the business Time is in. It's the same business all magazines are in.
The sad thing is I found the list far more interesting than the article. Hint: If your going to rant about something as a waste of time don't let it upstage you're job.
Capote. Sedaris. Darling. Sweetie. Patsy, darling.
Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#28As much as I used to hate those chain letters I mentioned above, I surprised myself and took part in the 25 things meme on Facebook. I actually found it pretty edifying. I wrote some things I didn't realize I was going through at the time and learned some things I didn't know about my friends.
Did I need Facebook to do this exercise? No. But the fact that Facebook facilitated it is far from "stupid," as the author suggests it is.
Re: 25 Things I Didn't Want to Know About You
#29"This recent bout of viral narcissism has sent roughly 800,000 hours of worktime productivity down the drain...But it's just so stupid...I can't believe I'm saying this, but I've finally found something more stupid than Twitter." I think the only thing worse than sharing mundane details about yourself for the world to see is to be the TIME writer that has sunk so low as to whine about it in a front-page article (yes,…
Really? This counts as journalism these days? No, but it counts as selling eyeballs to advertisers, which is the business Time is in. It's the same business all magazines are in.
My 25 things post on my blog has ended up #2 in Google for "25 things about me" and I am getting 200 or so visits a day to that post.
Now, I am not monetizing my blog and don't gain anything from the traffic, but it is interesting to see how much attention this meme is getting all of the sudden. Especially since it is nothing new.