Live data from Hacker News

Outlawed by Amazon DRM

bekkelund.net

21–30 of 494 posts

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#21

Is a Kindle usable without an Amazon account ?

There are other ways to load books on to a kindle (Calibre, IIRC, is a piece of software that can do this). This allows you to load epubs and other files.

I believe there are legal (non-pirate) ways to buy these, but I've really no idea how good the vendors are or how wide the catalogues are.

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#22
The worst part is the blatant arrogance of Mr. Michael Murphy, who does not at all consider the possibility of it all being a misunderstanding or some error on Amazon's behalf, and giving the customer no option to rectify the issue.

These are two options for who Michael Murphy is:

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-murphy/17/b72/231

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-murphy/0/b84/9b5

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#24
post #22

The worst part is the blatant arrogance of Mr. Michael Murphy, who does not at all consider the possibility of it all being a misunderstanding or some error on Amazon's behalf, and giving the customer no option to rectify the issue. These are two options for who Michael Murphy is: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-murphy/17/b72/231 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-murphy/0/b84/9b5

I don't think posting his personal details on the Internet is a very good idea.

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#25
post #7

This is why you should use a DRM removal tool and use a third party e-book reader on an Android tablet.

What's wrong with a drm removal tool and iBooks?

Replacing Amazon as gatekeeper with Apple is something of a frying-pan-to-fire move. Amazon's device really only does e-books; most people depend on Apple devices for an awful lot more, and consequently losing access to your Apple device would be vastly more painful.

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#26
The lack of transparency from Amazon here is worrying.

Because it appears to be Amazon UK dealing with the account holder I'd be interested to know if she would get anywhere by submitting a Subject Information Request [1].

Under the Data Protection Act 1998 an individual can submit a request for personal information held by an organization and they must comply within 40 days.

Whether she would get the information she is interested in, i.e. which account she is linked to, is another question.

[1] http://www.ico.gov.uk/for_the_public/personal_information/ho...

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#27
I have a Kindle but I don't want to have to do with Amazon. What is the best open firmware so far I can flash into it?

I'd like to retain ability to send documents from my computer to my Kindle over the internet.

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#28
post #22

The worst part is the blatant arrogance of Mr. Michael Murphy, who does not at all consider the possibility of it all being a misunderstanding or some error on Amazon's behalf, and giving the customer no option to rectify the issue. These are two options for who Michael Murphy is: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-murphy/17/b72/231 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-murphy/0/b84/9b5

I don't think posting his personal details on the Internet is a very good idea.

Michael Murphy posted his personal details on the Internet. asgeirn posted links.

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#29
an increased number of stories like this will make the book pirating underground a lot more attractive to a wider audience. it exists, it's not quite napster-like yet but it's getting there. no DRM, a potentially wider catalog, etc.

this is a risk for publishers and loss-leaders (like amazon) alike.

Re: Outlawed by Amazon DRM

#30

First, it's important to note that we don't have very much information yet. Given what I've read so far, I assume stupidity on the part of Amazon. Before everyone starts hating on Amazon specifically, remember that this same thing would happen with Apple, Xbox Live, or Barnes & Noble accounts. It's not that all these companies want to have DRM. It's the content owners who dictate the terms of licensing.

Assuming the story as presented is accurate, it's perfectly legitimate to criticize Amazon's heavy-handedness, arrogance and opacity. AFAIK, the content owners don't mandate specific customer service policies.
Post reply on HN