I use Cloudflare Pages for my blog, and I really like it, but my static blog generator (Quartz) only supports Giscus, which requires signing in with a GitHub account. I was thinking I might be able to hobble together a vibe-coded straightforward thing with Rust-> WASM to make an embeddable comment system, using Cloudflare Workers. I gotta say that Workers are shockingly pleasant to use. I think I might end up using t…
You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
21–30 of 56 posts
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#22I really like the offering that Cloudflare has with workers, but for me they just seem to be lacking some DX tooling/solutions. Debugging is hell, but for quick projects like this I'll definitely look into it again. These days Railway is my go-to for hosting "throw-away" projects. Always wondering how its going for folks that are using Cloudflare Workers as their main infra?
> I really like the offering that Cloudflare has with workers, but for me they just seem to be lacking some DX tooling/solutions. Cloudflare in general is a DX mess. Sometimes it's dashboard doesn't even work at all, and is peppered with error messages. Workers + Wrangler + it's tooling doesn't even manage to put together a usable or coherent change log, which makes it very hard to even track how and why their versio…
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#23Cloudflare Workers has really improved lately, e.g. "Observations" and "Metrics", and on top of that their product suite keeps growing all the time. If you use Astro[1] together with Cloudflare then you have a solution that is at least on par with NextJS and Vercel, but that only costs a fraction. My latest project[2] also uses Astro and Cloudflare and it is rendered on the "edge" (i.e. SSR) in about 100ms – you won'…
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried to port a nextjs project to cf + astro recently and it was a nightmare of usability and build issues. I'm sure they will work it out eventually but I won't be trying it again any time soon.
While Cloudflare is long-established, the Workers platform is relatively new and did have the issues you described; however, over the past few months it has become stable. Compared to Vercel, it is more technical and advanced.
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
What DB do you use? I tried the same for while but eventually gave up because it was incredibly restrictive and not much cheaper than a self managed VPS with some Docker containers. I mean the biggest thing that could happen to me is landing on the HN front page and a $5 per month VPS can manage that easily
You won't beat a good self-managed VPS with some docker containers unless you start adding criteria like SLAs and whatnot. Then you'll still not beat a good self-managed VPS but you'll have someone else to blame
1) Creating and restoring backups
2) Unoptimized disk access for db usage (can't be done from docker?)
3) Disk failure due to non-standard use-case
4) Sharding is quite difficult to set up
5) Monitoring is quite different from normal server monitoring
But surely, for a small app that can run one big server for the DB is probably still much cheaper. I just wonder how hard it really is and how often you actually run into problems.
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#26I really like the offering that Cloudflare has with workers, but for me they just seem to be lacking some DX tooling/solutions. Debugging is hell, but for quick projects like this I'll definitely look into it again. These days Railway is my go-to for hosting "throw-away" projects. Always wondering how its going for folks that are using Cloudflare Workers as their main infra?
> Debugging is hell Most people won't care because the extent of their debugging skills is console.log, echo, print. repeat 5000 times.
https://tedspence.com/the-art-of-printf-debugging-7d5274d6af...
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm building my entire back-end on CF Workers. The DX was really frustrating starting out, but I'm using Rust/WASM, which means most of my issues get caught at compile time. My suggestion: avoid all the CF offerings (DB, Pages, KV, etc.) and stick with just Workers. They're pretty stable and reliable (more so than Cloudflare itself, hehe), and once you figure out their rough edges, you'll be fine.
What DB do you use? I tried the same for while but eventually gave up because it was incredibly restrictive and not much cheaper than a self managed VPS with some Docker containers. I mean the biggest thing that could happen to me is landing on the HN front page and a $5 per month VPS can manage that easily
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
You won't beat a good self-managed VPS with some docker containers unless you start adding criteria like SLAs and whatnot. Then you'll still not beat a good self-managed VPS but you'll have someone else to blame
I am not much of a devops person but running your own DB in a VPS with docker containers don't you also need to handle all this manually too? 1) Creating and restoring backups 2) Unoptimized disk access for db usage (can't be done from docker?) 3) Disk failure due to non-standard use-case 4) Sharding is quite difficult to set up 5) Monitoring is quite different from normal server monitoring But surely, for a small ap…
But to answer your question: running your own DB is hard if you don't want to lose or corrupt your data. AWS is reliable and relatively cheap, at least during the bootstrapping and scaling stages.
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that they support WASM, which then means they support traditional compiled languages life C, C++, Golang, and Rust, what're you using, Malbodge?
Yeah, they are the only ones everyone uses, there is nothing else. And even those, have you ever tried anything beyond printf debugging? I bet not.
Re: You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm building my entire back-end on CF Workers. The DX was really frustrating starting out, but I'm using Rust/WASM, which means most of my issues get caught at compile time. My suggestion: avoid all the CF offerings (DB, Pages, KV, etc.) and stick with just Workers. They're pretty stable and reliable (more so than Cloudflare itself, hehe), and once you figure out their rough edges, you'll be fine.
> I'm building my entire back-end on CF Workers. The DX was really frustrating starting out, but I'm using Rust/WASM, which means most of my issues get caught at compile time. Cloudflare Workers support WASM, which is how they support any runtime beyond JavaScript. Cloudflare Worker's support for WASM is subpar, which is reflected even in things like the Terraform provider. Support for service bindings such as KV doe…
The worker model made sense, so I developed the whole app around it. Now of course, knowing what I know today, I might have considered different options. But at the time, I read the description (and had some Cloudflare Workers experience) and thought this looked good.