Earlier quoted context omitted.
Didn't realize this was such a niche idea that you'd be downvoted. I don't think anybody really benefits when a child or grandchild coasts through life on the basis of their ancestor's success.
I have encountered people for whom it is an obvious universal moral truth that authors of works should be able to monopolize their works indefinitely, and any attempt to curtail it is an attempt to steal rightfully earned money from poor struggling authors.
Re: Who owns Rudolph's nose?
#21I think that is a different take than supporting their poor struggling grandchildren. In general authors, aren’t making money off writing.