Live data from Hacker News

Why AI Doesn't Think: We Need to Stop Calling It "Cognition"

docs.google.com

21–22 of 22 posts

Re: Why AI Doesn't Think: We Need to Stop Calling It "Cognition"

#21

> "Cognition" has a meaning. It's not vague. In psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind, cognition refers to mental processes in organisms with nervous systems. Except if you actually look up the definitions, they don't mention "organisms with nervous systems" at all. Curious.

It’s laughable to think that anyone in psychology has a “technical” definition of anything really. It is entirely possible that our brain works in a very, very similar way. We really have no idea. Focus focusing on the difference between meat and silicon is fruitless. The analogies between how a human learn, learns, and how an AI learns, are too significant to ignore.

Human humans have some instinctive desire to think themselves elevated. I am convinced that my internal thoughts are just a phenomenon, and the notion of “I choose to think a given thought. “ is preposterous in an of itself. Where exactly is this lofty perch from which I am controlling i?

Re: Why AI Doesn't Think: We Need to Stop Calling It "Cognition"

#22

> "Cognition" has a meaning. It's not vague. In psychology, neuroscience, and philosophy of mind, cognition refers to mental processes in organisms with nervous systems. Except if you actually look up the definitions, they don't mention "organisms with nervous systems" at all. Curious.

It’s laughable to think that anyone in psychology has a “technical” definition of anything really. It is entirely possible that our brain works in a very, very similar way. We really have no idea. Focus focusing on the difference between meat and silicon is fruitless. The analogies between how a human learn, learns, and how an AI learns, are too significant to ignore. Human humans have some instinctive desire to thin…

What's with with the doubling?
Post reply on HN