Live data from Hacker News

San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

theguardian.com

21–30 of 151 posts

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#21

this won't cost the city too much, there's only like a hundred kids under 6 in this city and 3% of them are mine.

HN poster responds: "You have 0.18 kids under 6! That seems unlikely!"

nah, it just means you get 18% of childcare costs paid.

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#22
post #18

So now making 231k makes you worse off than someone making 230k? Why even have that threshold when it doesn't even exclude that many people, it just causes weird incentives.

Probably because in order to get it passed they had to have some cutoff because there was some people who would argue against it being free for everyone.

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#23
post #18

So now making 231k makes you worse off than someone making 230k? Why even have that threshold when it doesn't even exclude that many people, it just causes weird incentives.

The article also mentions a 50% subsidy up to $310,000. The details aren’t spelled out, but subsidies like this often phase out gradually to avoid a cliff at the threshold.

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#24

this won't cost the city too much, there's only like a hundred kids under 6 in this city and 3% of them are mine.

HN poster responds: "You have 0.18 kids under 6! That seems unlikely!"

Am i missing the joke? ChatGPT tells me 3% of 100 is 3, not 0.18.

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#25
post #6

That sounds like a good way to keep moms out of the workforce. I know a lot of couples who feel like the wife's job is a hobby, because after taxes it barely covers childcare (especially if you also value spending time with your kids). Free childcare could free those households up to decide which parent(s) work when. Instead, by capping it below a common dual income, it incentivizes the least earning parent to contin…

> I know a lot of couples who feel like the wife's job is a hobby, because after taxes it barely covers childcare (especially if you also value spending time with your kids).

When described that way ... aren't they right about the wife's job?

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN poster responds: "You have 0.18 kids under 6! That seems unlikely!"

Am i missing the joke? ChatGPT tells me 3% of 100 is 3, not 0.18.

You’re missing something if you asked ChatGPT that.

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN poster responds: "You have 0.18 kids under 6! That seems unlikely!"

Am i missing the joke? ChatGPT tells me 3% of 100 is 3, not 0.18.

.18 is 3% of 6. This might mean something, but I don't know what.

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN poster responds: "You have 0.18 kids under 6! That seems unlikely!"

Am i missing the joke? ChatGPT tells me 3% of 100 is 3, not 0.18.

When I first read it I thought wait, 3% of 6 is 0.18, but then I realized no I'm a dork because 6 is the age of the kid, whereas the number 100 is written as a word hundred, hence I decided to write "HN poster responds:" with quotes around my first non-coffee aided thought because I thought it was funny. I guess I should have just made that full statement, but I do have a tendency to rather oblique communication strategies.

on edit: basically because I thought hah, this is the kind of mistake I always see poor tired folks make on HN and making the dumb comment and here I am making it!! This is a classic moment!

Re: San Francisco to offer free childcare to people making up to $230k

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Am i missing the joke? ChatGPT tells me 3% of 100 is 3, not 0.18.

You’re missing something if you asked ChatGPT that.

No, they have their irony fully deployed, not missing anything.
Post reply on HN