Live data from Hacker News

Code is cheap now, but software isn't

chrisgregori.dev

21–30 of 79 posts

Re: Code is cheap now, but software isn't

#21

> People are increasingly building tools to solve a single, specific problem exactly once—and then discarding them. It is software as a disposable utility, designed for the immediate "now" rather than the distant "later." Yes! This is 100% it. This is a net good for everyone because it brings basic programming literacy to the masses and culls a lot of junk projects that are littering github or SaaS scams. It means pe…

In a way it's good but as far as energy usage goes, it sucks.

Not only is it taking way more energy to write software now with LLMS than by "hand", now everyone is repeating work many times over to write the same tools.

From a freedom standpoint one could argue is gives the user the most freedom to have what they want and need. But its very bad from an energy efficiency point of view.

Re: Code is cheap now, but software isn't

#26

Can't read this every paragraph ends with it's not x it's y. Just give me the prompt so I can read the real insights you have and not the generated fluff.

Yeah it's becoming increasingly obvious now. The moment I see this "contrast framing" I stop reading.

I read this as 'contrast farming' and like the term better.

Re: Code is cheap now, but software isn't

#27
post #8

> The barrier to entry has effectively collapsed. Google, Apple, Meta, X, Bluesky, Shopify, Stripe and all the big software companies must be really shaking in their boots for disruption against the army of vibe coders. /s (They are actually laughing at all of them)

What a random set of companies to choose. You'd probably need to think critically about each one of those when assessing the accuracy of your statements.
Post reply on HN