Live data from Hacker News

Iran is likely jamming Starlink

timesofisrael.com

21–30 of 306 posts

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#21

How likely is it that those "protestors" are US and Israel propped and the plan is to do another regime change via this route? Isn't this "son of the late Shah" a guy from the US?

...

I guess the people Israel is murdering on a massive scale are generally noncitizens, but it's still not really in a position to throw stones.

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#22
post #18
post #16

The article seems quite speculative. I'm sure the Iranian regime would live to jam starlink, but i don't think we have any ability to know what is actually happening here. The article claims 80% packetloss. That's still 1 in 5 packets getting through. That is annoying but not going to stop information getting out. I also wonder, if all other coms are cut off, is it possible star link in the country is just overloaded…

In my experience 80% packet loss makes most common protocols basically unusable. Yes you can still get data out...but many apps will just fail due to timeouts and other things.

I imagine the people with illegal starlink terminals are fairly tech savy and can use custom protocols. Living in Iran they probably already have a lot of experience with vpns and lower level protocols to evade censorship.

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#23
post #18
post #16

The article seems quite speculative. I'm sure the Iranian regime would live to jam starlink, but i don't think we have any ability to know what is actually happening here. The article claims 80% packetloss. That's still 1 in 5 packets getting through. That is annoying but not going to stop information getting out. I also wonder, if all other coms are cut off, is it possible star link in the country is just overloaded…

In my experience 80% packet loss makes most common protocols basically unusable. Yes you can still get data out...but many apps will just fail due to timeouts and other things.

Matrix published a proof of concept a few years ago of an alternative transport layer designed to work over connections with a few hundred bits per second, and massive packet loss, while still providing E2EE:

https://matrix.org/blog/2019/03/12/breaking-the-100bps-barri...

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#26
post #23
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In my experience 80% packet loss makes most common protocols basically unusable. Yes you can still get data out...but many apps will just fail due to timeouts and other things.

Matrix published a proof of concept a few years ago of an alternative transport layer designed to work over connections with a few hundred bits per second, and massive packet loss, while still providing E2EE: https://matrix.org/blog/2019/03/12/breaking-the-100bps-barri...

Without knowing that much about this area, i think https://mosh.org/ is a traditional choice if you need encrypted communication in a high packet loss environment.

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#27

How likely is it that those "protestors" are US and Israel propped and the plan is to do another regime change via this route? Isn't this "son of the late Shah" a guy from the US?

Very, but at the same time the Iranian leadership have been a really shitty government and ran the country into the gutter. People have genuine grievances.

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#28

How likely is it that those "protestors" are US and Israel propped and the plan is to do another regime change via this route? Isn't this "son of the late Shah" a guy from the US?

The only way to believe this is if you're a Westerner being fed a purely US-centric media diet. Otherwise you'd know all the ways that the Iranian government has been failing their people recently and for a long time now, and how unhappy Iranians are with their government. You people act like people can't be upset at how they're being treated by their own government without being incited by an external actor. That's honestly quite the dehumanising and insulting way of looking at it.

Also, if the US wanted to do a regime change, they'd just move in militarily a la Venezuela and Trump would be talking about it non-stop. He's not the subtle type, I promise. We'd already know if they were involved.

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#29
post #3

Which governments are referred to as "regimes" is usually propaganda about how you should feel about them. Consider: all articles written about US using the words "The US regime".

Regime refers to who holds power in a nation. It encompasses power holders in both formal and informal institutions which span beyond just the government. The major distinction is democratic versus autocratic regimes, with regime on its own referring specifically to the autocratic version. There are plenty of autocratic regimes which we (assuming everyone on the internet is American or at least from the West) are friendly with, like Jordan's.

Re: Iran is likely jamming Starlink

#30

How likely is it that those "protestors" are US and Israel propped and the plan is to do another regime change via this route? Isn't this "son of the late Shah" a guy from the US?

The only way to believe this is if you're a Westerner being fed a purely US-centric media diet. Otherwise you'd know all the ways that the Iranian government has been failing their people recently and for a long time now, and how unhappy Iranians are with their government. You people act like people can't be upset at how they're being treated by their own government without being incited by an external actor. That's…

I mean, Trump is talking about Iran nonstop.

https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/2026-01-10/ty-artic...

Post reply on HN