Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

mozilla.org

21–30 of 85 posts

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#21

After being a FF user for so many years (since at least there was no hype behind it among average users), I caved in to Chrome finally and completely. Moved my bookmarks (lost tagging), history and sync, all to Google.

So, that's great for you and all, but what the fuck does it have to do with the article?

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#22

I wish they'd just bump the version number to 30 then save major revision numbers for major revisions. I don't see anything in here that would warrant anything but a bump from 15 to 15.5 under the old Firefox revision standards.

I think even the Firefox team would agree with you in saying that their version numbers are now meaningless. Which is why they are slowly removing the version number from every user visible interaction.

The point is that Firefox never wants to ever have a "major release" again. Small frequent changes work much better for everybody. So what are their options? Keep incrementing the minor number? The major major number then becomes meaningless and you end up with absurdities like "2.6.39".

I think the solution they chose is much better than the one Linus chose. What's the difference between 2.6.39 and 3.0? About the same as 2.6.38 to 2.6.39, and 3.0 to 3.1. Eventually they'll get up to 3.BIG and he'll call it 4.0 for no particularly reason.

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#24

I wish they'd just bump the version number to 30 then save major revision numbers for major revisions. I don't see anything in here that would warrant anything but a bump from 15 to 15.5 under the old Firefox revision standards.

How come no one complains about Chrome version numbers?

In a reply to someone else, I did complain about Chrome's version numbers. That too bothers me. I have to imagine this issue is similar to people who complain about Windows RT's app model. Apple did it from day one, so there are few complaints. Microsoft switched to it just to keep up, which causes a lot of complaints. In this situation, Chrome is Apple who did it from day one without causing a major fuss, and Firefox is Microsoft who switched to it to great fanfare in order to keep up with the competition.

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#25
post #16

Is 16 worth installing? Firefox used to be my favourite browser, but I stopped using it when the almost daily install and "reload or disable" addons cycle became too painful.

That cycle should be invisible now. It updates silently in the background and should only notify you if an extension gets disabled.

And unlike in previous eras of Firefox, extensions are not typically disabled by the version bump.

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#26
post #14

Still my favourite browser by far. I usually have 3-4 windows open and up to several hundred tabs and Firefox handles this better than anything else.

With the "Tree Style Tab" extension you can manage tons of tabs in a comfortable and ordered way.

Hopefully someone will take on the enormous undertaking that will be fixing Panorama/Tab Candy to work properly. Where's Santa? That's all I want for Christmas.

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#28

Still not the feature I'd like in there: A way to open link here instead of in new tab or window

Hasn't that been a feature from day one. Are you sure you haven't got the option ticked that forces links to open in external tabs/windows?

If I right click on a link, I see options "Open link in new tab" and "Open link in new window". What's missing there is "Open link in this tab", to circumvent these pesky websites that configure every single link to open in a new tab/window.

Re: Firefox 16 live: Here's What's New

#29
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That cycle should be invisible now. It updates silently in the background and should only notify you if an extension gets disabled.

And unlike in previous eras of Firefox, extensions are not typically disabled by the version bump.

They should only get disabled if the use a feature that got removed.
Post reply on HN