Unlike Nano Banana it allows generating photos of children. Always fun to ask AI to imagine children of a couple but it's also kinda concerning that there might be terrible use cases.
GPT Image 1.5
21–30 of 272 posts
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#22Another bunch of "startups" have been eliminated.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#23Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?
My pet theory is that OpenAI screwed up the image normalization calculation and was stuck with the mistake since that's something that can't be worked around. At the least, it's not present in these new images.
There's still something off in the grading, and I suspect they worked around it
(although I get what you mean, not easily since you already trained)
I'm guessing when they get a clean slate we'll have Image 2 instead of 1.5. In LMArena it was immediately apparent it was an OpenAI model based on visuals.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#24I still use Midjourney, because all of these major players are so bad at stylistic and creative work. They're singularly focused on photorealism.
This is surprising. Is there a gallery of images that illustrates this?
Midjourney has a gallery on their website: https://www.midjourney.com/explore
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#25Nano Banana Pro is so good that any other attempt feels 1-2 generations behind.
Nano banana pro is almost as good as seedream 4.5!
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#26Unlike Nano Banana it allows generating photos of children. Always fun to ask AI to imagine children of a couple but it's also kinda concerning that there might be terrible use cases.
I was able to generate photos of my imagined children via Nano Banana
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#27Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?
Not really, but there's a number of theories. The simplest one is that they "style tuned" the AI on human preference data, and this introduced a subtle bias for yellow.
And I say "subtle" - but because that model would always "regenerate" an image when editing, it would introduce more and more of this yellow tint with each tweak or edit. Which has a way of making a "subtle" bias anything but.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#28I still use Midjourney, because all of these major players are so bad at stylistic and creative work. They're singularly focused on photorealism.
This is surprising. Is there a gallery of images that illustrates this?
their explore page is a firehose of examples created by users and you can see the prompt used so you can compare the results in other services
https://www.midjourney.com/explore?tab=video_top
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#29Was it ever explained or understood why ChatGPT Images always has (had?) that yellow cast?
Not really, but there's a number of theories. The simplest one is that they "style tuned" the AI on human preference data, and this introduced a subtle bias for yellow. And I say "subtle" - but because that model would always "regenerate" an image when editing, it would introduce more and more of this yellow tint with each tweak or edit. Which has a way of making a "subtle" bias anything but.
There was also the theory that is was because they scanned a bunch of actual real books and book paper has a slight yellow hue.
Re: GPT Image 1.5
#30It's still not available in the API despite them announcing the availability.
They even linked to their Image Playground where it's also not available..
I updated my local playground to support it and I'm just handling the 404 on the model gracefully