Live data from Hacker News

Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

irishpoliticsnewsletter.ie

21–30 of 106 posts

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#21
post #2

My first thought was "defend itself from what ?", but in this new ages of drones, I guess it could be an issue. IIRC, doesn't Ireland pay the UK for some type of defense ?

> defend itself from what ?" The article addresses this unfortunate attitude: the whole premise of your question is, "well they'd have to go through these other countries first, so not our problem". It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first. But, as the article also notes, air and sea power are things.…

> It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first

That's Spain's current position in NATO.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#22
post #17

I think Ireland's commitment to pacifism and neutrality is laudable. Too few people live here to be able to defend against attacks from a larger power, and Ireland's strong suit has always been diplomacy, anyway. That obviously annoys people who either (for some unfathomable reason) like war or stand to gain personally from increased defence spending. Fortunately, there is little appetite for the kind of militarisati…

[flagged]

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#23

Ireland having 0 military capabilities, and being completely dependent on NATO, while being extremely opinionated, on how and what NATO does, always irked me deeply.

Ireland doesn't have 0 military capabilities, they have enough of a military to conduct peacekeeping missions elsewhere, which they don't need to do. They just don't have the ability to defend an invasion, but they do certainly have a military that does good in the world.

Their "peacekeeping" missions are somewhere between utterly impotent / useless and actively counterproductive. Playing dumb and doing nothing while Hezbollah uses you as cover to launch missiles over the border from a couple hundred meters away is not keeping the peace.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#24
post #16
post #2

My first thought was "defend itself from what ?", but in this new ages of drones, I guess it could be an issue. IIRC, doesn't Ireland pay the UK for some type of defense ?

What if UK would be one to invade them?

Um.

See Irish history vs. the UK.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#25
post #2

My first thought was "defend itself from what ?", but in this new ages of drones, I guess it could be an issue. IIRC, doesn't Ireland pay the UK for some type of defense ?

> defend itself from what ?" The article addresses this unfortunate attitude: the whole premise of your question is, "well they'd have to go through these other countries first, so not our problem". It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first. But, as the article also notes, air and sea power are things.…

The Russians have actively sabotaged undersea cables belonging or connecting to NATO countries. What have they done about it?

In general, states like Kansas are dependent on Federal money anyway, so they they don’t really contribute much. 10 states basically support the Federal government from a tax perspective.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#26
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> defend itself from what ?" The article addresses this unfortunate attitude: the whole premise of your question is, "well they'd have to go through these other countries first, so not our problem". It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first. But, as the article also notes, air and sea power are things.…

> It's a bit like if Kansas refused to pay anything towards the defense budget because any hostile powers would have to go through all those other states first That's Spain's current position in NATO.

I don't entirely disagree, but at least Spain does have some semblance of a real military, even if it's underfunded.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#27
post #12

You know, there’s something to be said for Ireland’s attitude. The other islands (ha!) and the continent have treated them as second-class chattel for centuries, while competing amongst themselves for global hegemony. Better to stay out of that game and sort their own business, many of them think.

>Better to stay out of that game The Russians are making incursions into Irish waters and airspace, it's just a brute fact. So either they play the game, or Britain plays it for them. They don't get to sit aloof above it all, that's not how reality works. They are a protectorate in all but name, it's disgraceful.

Canada is in a similar situation. A lot of high-minded talk about peacekeeping and neutrality, but constantly benefitting from being implicitly protected by US defence policy. The real test will come if/when Russia decides to challenge Canadian arctic sovereignty.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#28

100% agreed with this article. The whole idea of Ireland's supposed neutrality is a farce. Does anyone really think that if a country like Russia decided to full-on invade Ireland, other European nations would just shrug it off? Of course not, and the Irish are well aware of that and rely on it (already they explicitly rely on the UK to help defend their country as a matter of policy). So really it's a simple hypocri…

Except the Irish army has conducted large numbers of peacekeeping missions as part of the United Nations. Irish soldiers have died in said operations. The Siege at Jadotville is one example - there is a pretty great film about this.

That's laudable, but it doesn't change the fact that they rely on their European neighbors to defend them while feigning "neutrality" and wouldn't return the favor if another, say, EU country were seriously attacked.

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#29
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ireland doesn't have 0 military capabilities, they have enough of a military to conduct peacekeeping missions elsewhere, which they don't need to do. They just don't have the ability to defend an invasion, but they do certainly have a military that does good in the world.

Their "peacekeeping" missions are somewhere between utterly impotent / useless and actively counterproductive. Playing dumb and doing nothing while Hezbollah uses you as cover to launch missiles over the border from a couple hundred meters away is not keeping the peace.

Yeah, didn't they completely fail at stopping hezbollah from rebuilding, right in their backyard?

Re: Ireland's Inability to Defend Itself

#30
post #16
post #2

My first thought was "defend itself from what ?", but in this new ages of drones, I guess it could be an issue. IIRC, doesn't Ireland pay the UK for some type of defense ?

What if UK would be one to invade them?

The UK already occupied the north of Ireland.
Post reply on HN