Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
21–30 of 85 posts
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#22Reminder that LLMs only(?) consume energy on the order of a few seconds of Netflix[1]. [1]: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net/post/3m6qdf5rffs2...
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#23People in the comments seem confused about this with statements like “greenest AI is no AI” style comments. And well, obviously that’s true but it’s an apples to pears comparison. Clearly Ecosia is pushing for “people want AI” _and_ we want to make it more ecofriendly. Taking away features from users altogether is not the right answer. It’s like saying “cheapest car is no car”. It doesn’t solve the fundamental proble…
I'm thinking a really good search engine would not make you reach for ai as often and so could be eco friendly that way
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#24I'm a bit confused -- do other search engines provide video generation? Mentioning that sounds too out of place to me. Am I missing something?
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#25Reminder that LLMs only(?) consume energy on the order of a few seconds of Netflix[1]. [1]: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net/post/3m6qdf5rffs2...
It's quickly pointed out that he's not counting the training of models, producing all the GPUs, energy spent on scraping, the increased storage needs from scraping the whole internet, etc.
It is fair to compare inference to streaming. Both are done by the end user.
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#26Reminder that LLMs only(?) consume energy on the order of a few seconds of Netflix[1]. [1]: https://bsky.app/profile/simonwillison.net/post/3m6qdf5rffs2...
That's inference only, otherwise people would not be buulding nuclear reactors to power AI.
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#27Running an LLM by default when I open your site is the most energy-consuming thing a computer can do, and the thing consumers hate the most in 2025.
The server shares resources!
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#28People in the comments seem confused about this with statements like “greenest AI is no AI” style comments. And well, obviously that’s true but it’s an apples to pears comparison. Clearly Ecosia is pushing for “people want AI” _and_ we want to make it more ecofriendly. Taking away features from users altogether is not the right answer. It’s like saying “cheapest car is no car”. It doesn’t solve the fundamental proble…
Isn't this why transit advocates try to reduce the need for owning a car though? I'm thinking a really good search engine would not make you reach for ai as often and so could be eco friendly that way
Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#29Re: Ecosia: The greenest AI is here
#30Is there no browser I can use without this AI trash jammed into it?