why are specifically the Danish so obsessed with pushing this through? it always seems to come back to them
EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
21–30 of 449 posts
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#22Either way politicians prefer to push unpopular stuff like this via the EU because the responsibility gets muddied - "we didn't want it, the EU regulation requires us to spy on you!".
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are a fool if you think the UK is better. I've moved from the EU to the UK and it is worse in every way when it comes to authoritarian measures. I'm not sure how you can have already forgotten the fact that we have to upload or face or ID to access websites.
In the UK we've had an authoritarian Conservative government for 14 years, followed by an even more authoritarian Labour government, which we'll have until 2029. In 2029 it's likely we'll have a more libertarian government: https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/united-kingdom/... Reform will repeal some of the awful legislation that's been passed over the last few years (e.g. Online Safety Act). They've been l…
As long as you are white British. If you're anything else you're probably going to be worse off under Farage.
It's a shame that if you want to vote for someone with different policies to the two main parties, you have to accept that you are also voting for an outspoken racist.
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#24why are specifically the Danish so obsessed with pushing this through? it always seems to come back to them
I guess it never hurts to try and find alternate ways of placating the US in order to make them get over their Greenland obession.
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#25Why are all politicians so shit? Launch these no-good leeches into the sun. Nobody wants this, including they themselves, which is why they specifically exempt themselves from it.
Clearly it’s not all of them. Some countries voted against, and even the ones voting in favour had a few people against. The question is more why do the shit politicians rise to the top. Outside forces (rich people and companies) have too much power and can exert too much influence. In this case I’m particularly curious about the Danes. They insisted on this more than any other previous attempt. They are forever soil…
Dumb and greedy voters, traditional and social media, and electoral interference are known reasons. But it's also a matter of compromise: you vote for a party because you agree with a bunch of their points, but almost certainly not all. Topics like privacy are ignored by the general public, so politicians are hardly held accountable for them.
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#26How they're packaging it now? Terrorism? Child porn? Russian agents? Either way politicians prefer to push unpopular stuff like this via the EU because the responsibility gets muddied - "we didn't want it, the EU regulation requires us to spy on you!".
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#27Authorities and banks avalanche everyone within their reach over all available communication channels with "warnings" about scams and frauds.
What direction are they aiming with this total control?
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#28Even living nearby in the UK it blows my mind how quickly the EU proposes, kills and then revives and passes controversial legislation in such a short timeframe.
The "proposal" was made something like 3 years ago, the killing never happened and the passing, if it passes, will happen in at least one year from now because this will definitely take a long time to get through parliament and even longer to get through the trilogue.
The process is many things but quick it is not
Re: EU Council Approves New "Chat Control" Mandate Pushing Mass Surveillance
#29why are specifically the Danish so obsessed with pushing this through? it always seems to come back to them
EU delegates and council members have to report their meetings with lobbyists.
Palantir and Thorn lobbyists (just the most famous ones, but you can add another few dozens security and data companies) are recorded meeting many times with countless of them, including Ursula von der Leyen.
It's really as simple as that, sales pitches convincing them of all the benefits of having more intelligence "to catch criminals (wink)".