21–24 of 24 posts
> Bepu Physics This is a seriously impressive physics engine. Their design is difficult to integrate with but the performance is insane. https://youtu.be/tjtwSq3u6Dg
What makes it difficult to integrate?
> Bepu Physics This is a seriously impressive physics engine. Their design is difficult to integrate with but the performance is insane. https://youtu.be/tjtwSq3u6Dg
Wow. That is actually very impressive. Things have moved quite a lot since I did a physics engine. What makes it difficult to integrate?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow. That is actually very impressive. Things have moved quite a lot since I did a physics engine. What makes it difficult to integrate?
https://github.com/bepu/bepuphysics2/blob/master/Demos/Demos...
The direct hooking into the narrow phase solver is the most performant way to go about it, but it does present several issues in state management. I did the same thing in Farseer Physics Engine, but also added high level events on bodies[1]. The extra abstraction makes it easier to work with, but due to the nature of delegates in C#, it was also quite a bit slower.
They could do with creating defaults for the narrow phase handler, buffer pool, threat dispatcher, etc. for devs who don't need extreme performance and just want a simple simulation.
[1] https://github.com/Genbox/VelcroPhysics/blob/ddf8292da6bc59e...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://github.com/bepu/bepuphysics2/blob/master/Demos/Demos...
Thanks! The direct hooking into the narrow phase solver is the most performant way to go about it, but it does present several issues in state management. I did the same thing in Farseer Physics Engine, but also added high level events on bodies[1]. The extra abstraction makes it easier to work with, but due to the nature of delegates in C#, it was also quite a bit slower. They could do with creating defaults for the…