21–30 of 220 posts
Marketing is absolutely doing the thing; ignore this to your peril. I don't think reality is quite as binary as this post suggests.
But that would be doing the thing after you’ve done the thing no?
I'm inspired by this and want to extend it, perhaps telescopically, by discussing what the thing is. Sometimes we see our task as being, "do C," and we forget the "B" and "A" that come before. Maybe you can't do "C" without discussing it ("B") or researching how others did it ("A"). In these cases, we shouldn't simply think the thing is "C"—the thing must first be "A," then "B," and then, "C." If we forget this, we'r…
You pay a doctor for a consultation. saying you paid the doctor for medical school and for the legacy of doctors that came before him is.... wrong.
I'm inspired by this and want to extend it, perhaps telescopically, by discussing what the thing is. Sometimes we see our task as being, "do C," and we forget the "B" and "A" that come before. Maybe you can't do "C" without discussing it ("B") or researching how others did it ("A"). In these cases, we shouldn't simply think the thing is "C"—the thing must first be "A," then "B," and then, "C." If we forget this, we'r…
You pay a doctor for a consultation. saying you paid the doctor for medical school and for the legacy of doctors that came before him is.... wrong.
I'm well compensated not because I'm good at googling things, but because I have a proven track record of being good at googling things. If a junior was able to produce the same results they wouldnt be paid more.
I'm inspired by this and want to extend it, perhaps telescopically, by discussing what the thing is. Sometimes we see our task as being, "do C," and we forget the "B" and "A" that come before. Maybe you can't do "C" without discussing it ("B") or researching how others did it ("A"). In these cases, we shouldn't simply think the thing is "C"—the thing must first be "A," then "B," and then, "C." If we forget this, we'r…
You pay a doctor for a consultation. saying you paid the doctor for medical school and for the legacy of doctors that came before him is.... wrong.
I'm inspired by this and want to extend it, perhaps telescopically, by discussing what the thing is. Sometimes we see our task as being, "do C," and we forget the "B" and "A" that come before. Maybe you can't do "C" without discussing it ("B") or researching how others did it ("A"). In these cases, we shouldn't simply think the thing is "C"—the thing must first be "A," then "B," and then, "C." If we forget this, we'r…
You pay a doctor for a consultation. saying you paid the doctor for medical school and for the legacy of doctors that came before him is.... wrong.
I'm inspired by this and want to extend it, perhaps telescopically, by discussing what the thing is. Sometimes we see our task as being, "do C," and we forget the "B" and "A" that come before. Maybe you can't do "C" without discussing it ("B") or researching how others did it ("A"). In these cases, we shouldn't simply think the thing is "C"—the thing must first be "A," then "B," and then, "C." If we forget this, we'r…
You pay a doctor for a consultation. saying you paid the doctor for medical school and for the legacy of doctors that came before him is.... wrong.
Writing a thing about things that aren't doing the thing isn't doing the thing unless the thing happens to be writing a thing about things that aren't doing the thing
Writing a comment about a thing that talks about things that aren't doing the thing isn't doing the thing unless the thing happens to be writing a comment about a thing that talks about things that aren't doing the thing
I wonder what thing the author was avoiding when they published this thing ;)