Scientists growing colour without chemicals
21–25 of 25 posts
Re: Scientists growing colour without chemicals
#22Semi-offtopic question, if I were to go to the shop and buy a piece of clothing colored with "normal" means, which colors are generally the least taxing on the environment? Some time ago I tried searching for an answer to this question online, but I couldn't find anything useful.
Re: Scientists growing colour without chemicals
#23Re: Scientists growing colour without chemicals
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably more importantly though, there's no particular reason the chemicals made by bacteria should be safer or less impactful to the environment. There's a few reasons to think that would tend to be the case, but any given compound isn't magically safe for human exposure because a micro-organism synthesized it.
I mean the downstream processes for extraction after biosynthesis are different and generally less likely to introduce other harmful chemicals.
Like you're going to do a lot of very specific, biotoxic things.
Re: Scientists growing colour without chemicals
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean the downstream processes for extraction after biosynthesis are different and generally less likely to introduce other harmful chemicals.
That's really not true though. The downstream processes after biosynthesis will have steps like "lyse all the cells open" and ,"definitely and thoroughly kill them and the off target proteins". Like you're going to do a lot of very specific, biotoxic things.