Live data from Hacker News

ICE and CBP agents are scanning faces on the street to verify citizenship

404media.co

21–30 of 380 posts

Re: ICE and CBP agents are scanning faces on the street to verify citizenship

#22
post #6

The irony of doing this while covering their own faces

[flagged]

All of the replies to my comment are focusing on the definition of irony.

It's like I'm 12 years old again hearing all my classmates talk about why having spoons when you need a knife isn't "actually" irony.

Re: ICE and CBP agents are scanning faces on the street to verify citizenship

#23
post #15

lol - I made something to do the same to ICE. Stores each ICE agent as a visual embedding and creates a database of all sighted agents. https://www.realtimefascism.com/ice-sight

What's your policy for complying with the patchwork of national biometrics laws?

Re: ICE and CBP agents are scanning faces on the street to verify citizenship

#24
The absolutely outrageous thing is that apparently they are instructed to ignore all other evidence of citizenship if that app says someone is not a citizen. So even if you have your birth certificate ready, doesn't matter.

This is completely lawless.

From the article:

> He also said “ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien.

Re: ICE and CBP agents are scanning faces on the street to verify citizenship

#26
post #17

[flagged]

I wonder why people downvote. Many western countries now couldn't be more obviously fascist. State responsibilities are being offloaded to multinational corporations, de facto private policing is around the corner, surveillance (digital ID tracking your movements and what you talk about, chat controls and whatnot). It's creeping in and people pretend it's not happening.

Re: ICE and CBP agents are scanning faces on the street to verify citizenship

#30
'Katz v. United States' was quite clear - you have no expectation of privacy in public. Anyone may photograph you and use said photos. Do I like it? No. But that is the current caselaw in USA.

"What a person knowingly exposes to the public [...] is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection." - Justice Potter in 'Katz v. United States'

Post reply on HN