Live data from Hacker News

Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

tomshardware.com

21–30 of 221 posts

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#21
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why isn't a cellphone filled with epoxy?

How would you do screen replacement? That is a common repair since people drop their phones and currently you can get your phone repaired by some teenager in a booth at the mall. If you fill the phone with epoxy, how are you detaching the screen, and getting a new ribbon cable through the epoxy?

use pogo pins or a board to board connector

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#24
post #7

It continues to amaze me how indestructible SDCards are.

It also amazes me how incredibly unbrowseable tomshardware is now with all the ads and pop-ups.

With UblockOrigin blocking the ads, there were no ads and pop-ups.

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#25

It continues to amaze me how indestructible SDCards are.

It continues to amaze me how indestructible SDCards are.

Until they're sold as supplemental hard drives (cough Transcend Jetdrive cough). Then they'll fail if you even look at them strangely.

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#26
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a solid piece of silicon encased in epoxy, so there's nothing really to get crushed. Contrast this to something like a cellphone that's made of hundreds of separate parts and has void space that will get crushed.

Why isn't a cellphone filled with epoxy?

  > Why isn't a cellphone filled with epoxy?
Added cost and weight are two things that would put off consumers. The phone would also be neigh irreparable, but consumers don't seem to care for that other than replacing their screen.

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#27
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a solid piece of silicon encased in epoxy, so there's nothing really to get crushed. Contrast this to something like a cellphone that's made of hundreds of separate parts and has void space that will get crushed.

Why isn't a cellphone filled with epoxy?

When was the last time your phone stopped working due mechanical PCB damage?

Typically the limiting factor on your phone is the screen breaking, your battery life getting too short, wear and tear on components like buttons or the charging port, and factory defects. Epoxy isn't going to help with any of those. The only thing it would help with is exposure to water, but if other parts of your phone like your screen aren't water proof, what's the point?

Epoxy adds weight and manufacturing cost. It introduces design challenges as you need to balance the thermal expansion of the various parts. It's an extra step that can go wrong, and makes repair of other defects far more difficult. What benefit is there for the typical consumer that outweighs these costs?

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#29
post #9
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It also amazes me how incredibly unbrowseable tomshardware is now with all the ads and pop-ups.

It also amazes me that people are using the internet w/o an adblocker in the year 2025

I haven’t bothered working out how to install one on mobile. I just don’t visit websites with shitty ads.

Re: Titan submersible’s $62 SanDisk memory card found undamaged at wreckage site

#30
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why isn't a cellphone filled with epoxy?

> Why isn't a cellphone filled with epoxy? Added cost and weight are two things that would put off consumers. The phone would also be neigh irreparable, but consumers don't seem to care for that other than replacing their screen.

A conformal coating wouldn't give much more weight.
Post reply on HN