Live data from Hacker News

Recursive Language Models (RLMs)

alexzhang13.github.io

21–30 of 38 posts

Re: Recursive Language Models (RLMs)

#21
post #15

Hopefully this can solve the problem of Claude needing to compact itself every 10 minutes, blocking execution. It would be better if it was always compacting in the background. But that requires perhaps more compute than is realistic.

For that issue, try Codex until Claude catches up to your style.

Re: Recursive Language Models (RLMs)

#23
This is what Codex is doing. The LM has been trained to work well with the kinds of tools that a solid developer would use to navigate and search around a code repository and then to reason about what it finds. It’s also really competent at breaking down a task into steps. But I think the real magic - watching this thing for at least 40 of the last 50 working hours - is how it uses command line tools to dig through code quickly and accurately.

It’s not relying on the LM context much. You can generally code away for an hour before you run out of context and have to run a compression step or just start fresh.

Re: Recursive Language Models (RLMs)

#27
I’m not sure if I understood this correctly:

1.Recursion is used to break down the large context and dispatch to different LLM calls to get the useful context.

2.This may lead to longer test-time execution on large contexts (even with parallelism in deep recursion), and the monetary cost may increase rapidly.

I think it’s a different idea from using RAG or manually maintaining a context window

correct me if I'm wrong

Re: Recursive Language Models (RLMs)

#29

If you would setup an RLM, would you set a higher temperature for the root LLM calls and a lower temperature for LLM calls deeper in the recursion?

Just wanted to say that I really like this question. Very thought-provoking :)

EDIT: makes me think of many computation systems in various substrates, and how they work. Focus vs distraction/creativity. ADHD workers in hierarchies of capitalism, purpose of breadth vs depth of exploration at various levels of the stack, who's at the "top" and why, etc etc

Post reply on HN