Link to kuzudb internals: https://kuzudb.com/docs/developer-guide/database-internal/
We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
21–30 of 68 posts
Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#22Abandoned for a new project. Kuzu is Japanese for unwanted/useless scraps or garbage, so I suppose it's still living up to its name.
Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#23Oh too bad. Small fast embedded graph DBs are rare. Any good alternatives?
Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that GQL is now supported by some of the relational Database, doesn't mean they'll become an alternative to native Graph Databases.
Yeah I guess it’s like saying that relational DBs supporting native JSON type meant the end of NoSQL DBs.
This holds true for 95% of cases of well-made software.
Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#25Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#26https://duckdb.org/community_extensions/extensions/duckpgq.h...
https://adsharma.github.io/beating-the-CAP-theorem-for-graph...
Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#27Re: We will no longer be actively supporting KuzuDB
#28I use the Python Kuzu graph database library, super convenient for local experiments. I see no reason to stop using it. The underlying database is archived on GitHub so it isn’t going anywhere.
Last few releases, you couldn't open a file written by a previous version of kuzu. You had to constantly export/import as new versions were released.
This is no longer a problem for kuzu because development has stopped. But any open source fork needs to think about how to stabilize storage.
In the past few releases kuzu switched from database as a directory to a single file database.