Live data from Hacker News

ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

techcrunch.com

21–30 of 230 posts

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Federal law supersedes state law. ICE is simply enforcing federal immigration laws.

> ICE is simply enforcing federal immigration laws “From January to June, the average number of detainees per day in ICE custody rose 43 percent, to more than 57,000. But since July, when the [OBBA] funding was approved, the detainee population has increased only about 5 percent, to roughly 60,000, the latest statistics show. The stream of social-media clips showing masked federal agents kicking down doors, raiding H…

Difference between deportations under Obama vs Trump is they aren't coming right back over.

Easy to inflate deportations when you catch the same fish and the river is flowing.

Much slower when you dam off the river and have to dig the remaining catfish out of the mud.

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A Federal government agency is "a paramilitary group operating illegally inside the US?" What? "I think they're being employed in a shitty and potentially illegal manner outside their remit" is a perfectly arguable take that doesn't require tinfoil-hattery.

It doesn't require any tinfoil-hattery though because everything they're doing is very public. Like you look at their actions Chicago [1] and I think it's impossible to NOT think they're an illegal paramilitary group. They're rounding up, detaining and arresting US citizens and destroying their property under the guise of sweeping illegal immigrants. They've violated people's constitutional rights multiple times over…

[deleted]

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#23
post #2

> the relationship between the agency and the company predates the Trump administration IMSI catchers/stingrays have been common practice in local law enforcement for decades, haven't they? How is this different? > Some cell-site simulators can also intercept regular calls, text messages, and internet traffic. In what decade was this true, other than text messages? I don't think it is very easy even for an IMSI catch…

[flagged]

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#24

anytime these type of stories come up, its helpful for someone to post about ieee's rayhunter opensource project. https://github.com/EFForg/rayhunter which pairs nicely with a https://www.amazon.com/Orbic-Verizon-Hotspot-Connect-Enabled...

Hmm, says it works with the Pinephone and Pinephone Pro too, which are very portable, and are just generally devices many more would consider useful (I've thought about buying one at least, just for the open-source-ness of it)

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#25

Why aren't they using the official lawful interception interfaces? They will get all the data. Not only voice, data and SMS/RCS. All modern smartphones (like Pixels) allow you to switch off 2G. They even warn if you want to activate it.

> Why aren't they using the official lawful interception interfaces? They may not want to leave a paper trail. “To obtain a [legal] wiretap order, law enforcement must demonstrate probable cause to a judge” [1]. Given ICE has been arresting Americans, they probably aren’t bothering with cause. Legal intercepts also require “minimization procedures to limit the interception of conversations unrelated to the investigat…

But, isn't intercepting communications using a fake cell tower a wiretap?

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> ICE is simply enforcing federal immigration laws “From January to June, the average number of detainees per day in ICE custody rose 43 percent, to more than 57,000. But since July, when the [OBBA] funding was approved, the detainee population has increased only about 5 percent, to roughly 60,000, the latest statistics show. The stream of social-media clips showing masked federal agents kicking down doors, raiding H…

Difference between deportations under Obama vs Trump is they aren't coming right back over. Easy to inflate deportations when you catch the same fish and the river is flowing. Much slower when you dam off the river and have to dig the remaining catfish out of the mud.

> Difference between deportations under Obama vs Trump is they aren't coming right back over

“U.S. Border Patrol agents recorded nearly 238,000 apprehensions of migrants crossing the southern border illegally in fiscal year 2025” [1]. For 2012 to 2015, the chart shows about 360k, 420k, 480k and 330k, respectively.

So ICE is spending $330 to 580 thousand dollars per additional Southwest border encounter in 2025 versus 2012. ($250 to 440 thousand if we average Obama’s second-term numbers.)

These numbers 10x even San Francisco’s circa 2016 homeless-industrial profligacy [2]. Unless ICE is a ball of wormy corruption, they’re clearly not focused on immigration enforcement.

[1] https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/10/icymi-illegal-cr...

[2] https://www.hoover.org/research/despite-spending-11-billion-...

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#27
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might not like the tone, but I don't see what makes the words false. "Paramilitary" describes a non-military group behaving similarly to a military group, and we're talking about armed masked men sweeping homes, taking prisoners, and engaging in violent conflicts. "Operating illegally" means that federal, state, or local laws have been broken, and that seems to be the case, e.g. Gonzalez v. ICE.

Federal law supersedes state law. ICE is simply enforcing federal immigration laws.

Do you agree enforcing immigration laws in this way is good and/or important? If so, can I ask why? What is our end goal?

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#28
post #2

> the relationship between the agency and the company predates the Trump administration IMSI catchers/stingrays have been common practice in local law enforcement for decades, haven't they? How is this different? > Some cell-site simulators can also intercept regular calls, text messages, and internet traffic. In what decade was this true, other than text messages? I don't think it is very easy even for an IMSI catch…

[flagged]

[deleted]

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#29
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why aren't they using the official lawful interception interfaces? They may not want to leave a paper trail. “To obtain a [legal] wiretap order, law enforcement must demonstrate probable cause to a judge” [1]. Given ICE has been arresting Americans, they probably aren’t bothering with cause. Legal intercepts also require “minimization procedures to limit the interception of conversations unrelated to the investigat…

But, isn't intercepting communications using a fake cell tower a wiretap?

Of course it is. But good luck proving how they got the information.

Re: ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones

#30
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's different because ICE is a paramilitary group operating illegally inside the US. They don't get warrants, engage in racial profiling, disappeared 2/3rds of the people sent to some of their facilities, arrest citizens, assault peaceful protesters, etc. They're doing this over the objection of state and local authorities, and despite the fact that their actions have been repeatedly ruled illegal by the courts.

It is critical to understand that as a general rule, what they are doing is completely legal. We created the conditions for this to happen and are empowered to change it.

I mean slavery was legal, Jim Crow was legal...

A lot of things are legal and still wrong based on our core principles as a country. Its our duty to oppose them.

Post reply on HN