Innovation at the expense of crushing workers and increasing the gap between parasitic management compensation and worker wages. No, thanks. Europe may need reform but it’s not the USA way of doing things, except for the elite for which “ the economist “ is a already known and tired sockpuppet.
Why do you need to reference the USA? Makes it seem like your politics are based on resentment and not a dispassionate discussion of tradeoffs
How Europe crushes innovation
21–30 of 146 posts
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#22Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#23It's not so much crushing innovation, as it's prioritizing anything but innovation. Primarily the importance and the finances of people living in Brussels. It's more parasitic than actively hostile
How does the cost of the Brussels administration compare to, say, the US federal administration? A spot-checked LLM answer tells me, as fraction of GDP: - EU: 1% - US: 24% - China: 35% That is quite a favourable comparison for Europe, I'd say. EDIT if anything, staring at these numbers, one might conclude the EU is not spending enough in general, in particular on innovation. Quite the stark contrast to being a money…
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#24Innovation at the expense of crushing workers and increasing the gap between parasitic management compensation and worker wages. No, thanks. Europe may need reform but it’s not the USA way of doing things, except for the elite for which “ the economist “ is a already known and tired sockpuppet.
Why do you need to reference the USA? Makes it seem like your politics are based on resentment and not a dispassionate discussion of tradeoffs
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#25Meanwhile it seems that Europe has been pulling ahead of us in measures that affect the quality of life for common people, including the working class. While the fear of "stagnation" was remotely believable during the 1970s, it's clear today that we're the ones who've been hornswoggled.
The US is still better for making software, as China is better for making printed circuit boards, but I'm not sure either of those things are all that bad for the common people.
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#26I'd rather live in a society with strong labor protections than one that is "more innovative", whatever that means.
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#27I'd rather live in a society with strong labor protections than one that is "more innovative", whatever that means.
Do you really? Or do you actually want to sustain your standard of living as safely as you can? Because then the question arises: What if the current way of handling labor protection in the EU (as one of many components) leads to destroying yours and everyone elses standard of living, simply because it's unaffordable? Would you still argue that this is the way to go? Everyone going down with the ship together? I don'…
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#28Innovation at the expense of crushing workers and increasing the gap between parasitic management compensation and worker wages. No, thanks. Europe may need reform but it’s not the USA way of doing things, except for the elite for which “ the economist “ is a already known and tired sockpuppet.
Why do you need to reference the USA? Makes it seem like your politics are based on resentment and not a dispassionate discussion of tradeoffs
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
How does the cost of the Brussels administration compare to, say, the US federal administration? A spot-checked LLM answer tells me, as fraction of GDP: - EU: 1% - US: 24% - China: 35% That is quite a favourable comparison for Europe, I'd say. EDIT if anything, staring at these numbers, one might conclude the EU is not spending enough in general, in particular on innovation. Quite the stark contrast to being a money…
How are you arriving at these percentages? Show your work.
Re: How Europe crushes innovation
#30It's not so much crushing innovation, as it's prioritizing anything but innovation. Primarily the importance and the finances of people living in Brussels. It's more parasitic than actively hostile
How does the cost of the Brussels administration compare to, say, the US federal administration? A spot-checked LLM answer tells me, as fraction of GDP: - EU: 1% - US: 24% - China: 35% That is quite a favourable comparison for Europe, I'd say. EDIT if anything, staring at these numbers, one might conclude the EU is not spending enough in general, in particular on innovation. Quite the stark contrast to being a money…