It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation (EDIT: they’re a US corp), would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers. Or are they baking the restrictions into the model weights?
Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
21–30 of 145 posts
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#22Very strange writing from semafor.com >For instance, an agency could pay for a subscription or negotiate a pay-per-use contract with an AI provider, only to find out that it is prohibited from using the AI model in certain ways, limiting its value. This is of course quite false. They of course know the restriction when they sign the contract.
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#23Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#24Very strange writing from semafor.com >For instance, an agency could pay for a subscription or negotiate a pay-per-use contract with an AI provider, only to find out that it is prohibited from using the AI model in certain ways, limiting its value. This is of course quite false. They of course know the restriction when they sign the contract.
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#25Are government agencies sending prompts to model inference APIs on remote servers? Or are they running the models in their own environment? It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation (EDIT: they’re a US corp) , would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers. Or are they baking the restrictions into the model weights?
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#26Are government agencies sending prompts to model inference APIs on remote servers? Or are they running the models in their own environment? It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation (EDIT: they’re a US corp) , would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers. Or are they baking the restrictions into the model weights?
"Foreign" to who? I interpretted your comment as foreign to the US government (please correct me if I'm wrong) and I was confused because Anthropic is a US company.
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#27Very strange writing from semafor.com >For instance, an agency could pay for a subscription or negotiate a pay-per-use contract with an AI provider, only to find out that it is prohibited from using the AI model in certain ways, limiting its value. This is of course quite false. They of course know the restriction when they sign the contract.
There are (or at least WERE) entire divisions dedicated to reading every letter of the contract and terms of service, and usually creating 20 page documents seeking clarification for a specific phrase. They absolutely know what they're getting into.
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#28Are government agencies sending prompts to model inference APIs on remote servers? Or are they running the models in their own environment? It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation (EDIT: they’re a US corp) , would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers. Or are they baking the restrictions into the model weights?
> It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation, would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers. "Foreign" to who? I interpretted your comment as foreign to the US government (please correct me if I'm wrong) and I was confused because Anthropic is a US company.
The concern remains even if it’s a US corporation though (not government owned servers).
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#29Are government agencies sending prompts to model inference APIs on remote servers? Or are they running the models in their own environment? It’s worrying to me that Anthropic, a foreign corporation (EDIT: they’re a US corp) , would even have the visibility necessary to enforce usage restrictions on US government customers. Or are they baking the restrictions into the model weights?
Re: Anthropic irks White House with limits on models’ use
#30Very strange writing from semafor.com >For instance, an agency could pay for a subscription or negotiate a pay-per-use contract with an AI provider, only to find out that it is prohibited from using the AI model in certain ways, limiting its value. This is of course quite false. They of course know the restriction when they sign the contract.
There are (or at least WERE) entire divisions dedicated to reading every letter of the contract and terms of service, and usually creating 20 page documents seeking clarification for a specific phrase. They absolutely know what they're getting into.