HTTPS://www.abortretry.fail
Mother of All Demos (1968)
21–30 of 39 posts
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#22People talk about Apple stealing from Xerox, but what you may not know is that Douglas Engelbart's team at SRI left shortly after this demo and took everything to Xerox without him. The man spent the rest of his career being swept into gutters, never got any recognition until the early 2000s at the very end of his life. It's a really tragic tale.
Well, sort of. I mean, yeah he deserved to be praised, but the reason half the SRI staff left to go to Xerox is that Engelbart and his people were becoming obsessed with EST training. EST is basically a cult that starves you, insults you until you cry, then builds you back up with compliments while asking you to pay up front for the next sucker in your family to take the "training." It's about as close as you can get…
Edit: found this comment from hn a few years back with a link: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38584517
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's factually incorrect. Engelbart was recognized as the man that started it all by plenty of people in the industry, to the point the Logitech (a Swiss company, go figure) allocated him a an office for his Bootstrap Institute just because they thought it was the right thing to do. https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/07/23/177246/douglas-e... Anybody in the industry knows who Engelbart is and his name recognitio…
I think it's reasonable to think that he deserved more recognition. But I also recall attending a Techcrunch party at Mike Arringtons house in 2006/7 or so that Engelbart showed up at briefly, and how fun it was to see him instantly surrounded like a celebrity, so I think you're righ he was recognised in the circles where it mattered.
That I will definitely agree with.
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's factually incorrect. Engelbart was recognized as the man that started it all by plenty of people in the industry, to the point the Logitech (a Swiss company, go figure) allocated him a an office for his Bootstrap Institute just because they thought it was the right thing to do. https://www.technologyreview.com/2013/07/23/177246/douglas-e... Anybody in the industry knows who Engelbart is and his name recognitio…
Interesting, that much isn't common knowledge. I was only aware of the struggles he had at Time Share and later obscure research foundations. It's good to know his name mattered in important places, that kind of stuff often doesn't filter down to us on the outside.
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#25I wish that this wasn’t a LLM-generated summary of a YouTube video. I wish that this was a personal website and the content was handwritten. That the voice and insight was yours . Reading LLM-generated prose is like reading an obituary. The name appropriately describes the content. The font weight for the table of contents doesn’t appear to sufficiently increase to indicate the user’s place on the page.
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#26I wish that this wasn’t a LLM-generated summary of a YouTube video. I wish that this was a personal website and the content was handwritten. That the voice and insight was yours . Reading LLM-generated prose is like reading an obituary. The name appropriately describes the content. The font weight for the table of contents doesn’t appear to sufficiently increase to indicate the user’s place on the page.
All important points, thanks for the feedback! I'll update UI for the table of contents in a moment. As for LLMs, my vision for Wordspike’s not to replace human voice, but to act as a filter. It's an add-on to see what video content is valuable to watch in full. It's my attempt to built a counter-weight to the endless amount of shorts and slop I see online.
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#27Amazingly, you can watch the whole thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
All important points, thanks for the feedback! I'll update UI for the table of contents in a moment. As for LLMs, my vision for Wordspike’s not to replace human voice, but to act as a filter. It's an add-on to see what video content is valuable to watch in full. It's my attempt to built a counter-weight to the endless amount of shorts and slop I see online.
So, let me get this straight: your attempt at reducing the amount of slop you see is to produce more slop?
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#29https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJDv-zdhzMY
Better article:
Re: Mother of All Demos (1968)
#30I wish that this wasn’t a LLM-generated summary of a YouTube video. I wish that this was a personal website and the content was handwritten. That the voice and insight was yours . Reading LLM-generated prose is like reading an obituary. The name appropriately describes the content. The font weight for the table of contents doesn’t appear to sufficiently increase to indicate the user’s place on the page.
If you prefer nothing at all, then just move on, close the tab, and pretend you never saw it.