Live data from Hacker News

GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

docs.z.ai

21–30 of 90 posts

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#21

Available on OpenRouter as well for those who want to test it: https://openrouter.ai/z-ai/glm-4.5 I would be interested to know where the claim of the “killer combination” comes from. I would also like to know who the people behind Z.ai are — I haven’t heard of them before. Their plans seem crazy cheap compared to Anthropic, especially if their models actually perform better than Opus.

update the title to not seem biased / hyped

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#22
post #13

I've been using GLM 4.5 and GLM 4.5 Air for a while now. The Air model is light enough to run on a macbook pro and is useful for Cline. I can run the full GLM model on my Mac Studio, but the TPS is so slow that it's only useful for chatting. So I hooked up with openrouter to try but didn't have the same success. Any of the open weight models I try with open router give sub standard results. I get better results from…

yeah I too have heard similar concerns with Open models on OpenRouter, but haven't been able to verify it, as I don't use that a lot

(OpenRouter COO here) We are starting to test this and verify the deployments. More to come on that front -- but long story short is that we don't have good evidence that providers are doing weird stuff that materially affects model accuracy. If you have data points to the contrary, we would love them.

We are heavily incentivized to prioritize/make transparent high-quality inference and have no incentive to offer quantized/poorly-performing alternatives. We certainly hear plenty of anecdotal reports like this, but when we dig in we generally don't see it.

An exception is when a model is first released -- for example this terrific work by artificial analysis: https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/1955102409044398415

It does take providers time to learn how to run the models in a high quality way; my expectation is that the difference in quality will be (or already is) minimal over time. The large variance in that case was because GPT OSS had only been out for a couple of weeks.

For well-established models, our (admittedly limited) testing has not revealed much variance between providers in terms of quality. There is some but it's not like we see a couple of providers 'cheating' by secretly quantizing and clearly serving less intelligence versions of the model. We're going to get more systematic about it though and perhaps will uncover some surprises.

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#23
Used it to fix a couple of bugs just now in Elixir and it runs very fast, faster than Codex with GPT-5 medium or high.

This is quite nice. Will try it out a bit longer over the weekend. I tested it using Claude Code with env variables overrides.

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#24
post #2

I stopped when I got to this sentence and realized the article is written by one of the companies mentioned. > GLM-4.5 and GLM-4.5-Air are our latest flagship models Maybe it is great, but with a conflict of interest so obvious I can't exactly take their word for it.

Z.AI is the company that created GLM and the link goes to their official documentation. It’s really weird to complain that their official documentation on their official website has a “conflict of interest”.

Just out of curiosity, is the cost of such domain worth it or whether they were just lucky.

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yeah I too have heard similar concerns with Open models on OpenRouter, but haven't been able to verify it, as I don't use that a lot

(OpenRouter COO here) We are starting to test this and verify the deployments. More to come on that front -- but long story short is that we don't have good evidence that providers are doing weird stuff that materially affects model accuracy. If you have data points to the contrary, we would love them. We are heavily incentivized to prioritize/make transparent high-quality inference and have no incentive to offer qua…

Unsolicited advice: Why doesn’t open router provide hosting services for OSS models that guarantee non-quantised versions of the LLMs? Would be a win-win for everyone.

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(OpenRouter COO here) We are starting to test this and verify the deployments. More to come on that front -- but long story short is that we don't have good evidence that providers are doing weird stuff that materially affects model accuracy. If you have data points to the contrary, we would love them. We are heavily incentivized to prioritize/make transparent high-quality inference and have no incentive to offer qua…

Unsolicited advice: Why doesn’t open router provide hosting services for OSS models that guarantee non-quantised versions of the LLMs? Would be a win-win for everyone.

In fact I thought that's what OpenRouter was hosting them all along

Re: GLM 4.5 with Claude Code

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(OpenRouter COO here) We are starting to test this and verify the deployments. More to come on that front -- but long story short is that we don't have good evidence that providers are doing weird stuff that materially affects model accuracy. If you have data points to the contrary, we would love them. We are heavily incentivized to prioritize/make transparent high-quality inference and have no incentive to offer qua…

Unsolicited advice: Why doesn’t open router provide hosting services for OSS models that guarantee non-quantised versions of the LLMs? Would be a win-win for everyone.

Would make very little business sense at this point - currently they have an effective monopoly on routing. Hosting would just make them one provider among a few dozen. It would make the other providers less likely to offer their services through openrouter. It would come with lots of concerns that openrouter would favor routing towards their own offerings. It would be a huge distraction to their core business which is still rapidly growing. Would need massive capital investment. And another thousand reasons I haven't thought of.
Post reply on HN