Another blog post about the study that found 90% of employees were using AI regularly in their work....that totally omits the part about 90% of employees using AI regularly. The study found that company implementations were failing while people heavily used their own choice LLMs.
I agree. The original report is vague about that as well: > Over 80 percent of organizations have explored or piloted them, and nearly 40 percent report deployment. But these tools primarily enhance individual productivity, not P&L performance. How on earth does "enhancing individual productivity" not improve P&L performance?
Here's a recent experiment: https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/04/m365_copilot_uk_gover...
A fairly common pattern seems to be emerging; users _believe_ that it makes them more productive, but attempts to actually measure this don't show that.